Rozzelle v. State, 1D13–2639.
Decision Date | 26 July 2013 |
Docket Number | No. 1D13–2639.,1D13–2639. |
Citation | 119 So.3d 493 |
Parties | Roger Allen ROZZELLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Roger Allen Rozzelle, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
By petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner challenges his judgment and sentence in Okaloosa County Circuit court case number 98–CF–1143. The petition is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) ( ).
Due to petitioner's apparent abuse of the legal process by his repeated pro se filings attacking his conviction and sentence, this court issued an order directing petitioner to show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48 (Fla.1999) ( ). Petitioner's response to the show cause order does not provide a legal basis to prohibit the imposition of sanctions.
As such, because petitioner's continued and repeated attacks on his conviction and sentence have become an abuse of the legal process, we hold that he is barred from future pro se filings in this court concerning Okaloosa County Circuit court case number 98–CF–1143. The Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept any future filings concerning this case unless they are filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. Petitioner is warned that any filings which violate the terms of this opinion may result in a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes. SeeFla. R.App. P. 9.410.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
...Court of Appeal rejected these two claims on procedural grounds. This procedural rule is regularly enforced. See Rozelle v. State, 119 So.3d 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (per curiam) (dismissing a petition for writ of habeas corpus, in which the petitioner challenged his judgment and sentence an......
- Day v. State