Ruth v. Kennedy, 43588

Decision Date12 April 1968
Docket NumberNo. 3,No. 43588,43588,3
Citation117 Ga.App. 632,161 S.E.2d 410
PartiesBetty RUTH, by Next Friend v. John KENNEDY
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Kenneth H. Cail, Gilbert E. Johnson, Savannah, for appellant.

Brannen, Clark & Hester, Fred S. Clark, Savannah, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

JORDAN, Presiding Judge.

The notice of appeal recites that the plaintiff 'hereby appeals to the Court of Appeals from the order entered on her motion to purge the jury' and that thereafter the case proceeded to verdict and final judgment for the defendant. The order designated by the plaintiff as the judgment, ruling, or order entitling her to an appeal, i.e., the ruling on her motion to purge the jury, is interlocutory and outside the definition of those judgments or orders listed in Code Ann. § 6-701 which entitle a party to an appeal, and which the party must so designate in the notice of appeal under the provisions of Code Ann. § 6-802. The fact that an appealable judgment is shown to exist, or that the antecedent ruling on the motion to purge the jury would be reviewable when enumerated as error on the proper designation of an appealable judgment, does not cure the fatal defect in the notice of appeal arising from the failure to appeal from such a judgment. Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Birdwell v. Pippen, 113 Ga.App. 202, 147 S.E.2d 673; Parish v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Company, 115 Ga.App. 540, 154 S.E.2d 750; Richard's Buick, Incorporated v. Sease, 116 Ga.App. 232, 156 S.E.2d 365; Cody v. State, 116 Ga.App. 331, 157 S.E.2d 496; Gibson v. Hodges, 221 Ga. 779, 147 S.E.2d 329; Interstate Fire Insurance Company v. Chattam, 222 Ga. 436, 150 S.E.2d 618; Norbo Trading Corporation v. Wohlmuth, 223 Ga. 258, 154 S.E.2d 224.

Appeal dismissed.

PANNELL and DEEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Seaton v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 5, 1988
    ...Practice Act.' Id. at 741, 164 S.E.2d 816. Rulings of this Court are consistent with those of the Supreme Court. In Ruth v. Kennedy, 117 Ga.App. 632, 161 S.E.2d 410, we held that where the "notice of appeal recites that the plaintiff 'hereby appeals to the Court of Appeals from the order en......
  • Whiddon v. Stargell
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1989
    ...from such a judgment. Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal." (Emphasis supplied.) Ruth v. Kennedy, 117 Ga.App. 632, 161 S.E.2d 410; see also Fredericks v. State, 168 Ga.App. 278, 308 S.E.2d 693. The case before us readily is distinguishable from those inst......
  • Blackwell v. Cantrell, 67010
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 1984
    ...merely to failing "to specify definitely the judgment." See Ballew v. State, supra at 548, 170 S.E.2d 242. Accord Ruth v. Kennedy, 117 Ga.App. 632, 161 S.E.2d 410 (1968); Rush v. State, 124 Ga.App. 547, 184 S.E.2d 515 The plaintiff contends that the defect in the original notice of appeal w......
  • Richardson v. General Motors Corp., A96A0039
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 30, 1996
    ...such a judgment. Accordingly, this court is [simply] without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.' (Emphasis supplied.) Ruth v. Kennedy, 117 Ga.App. 632, 161 S.E.2d 410; see also Fredericks v. State, 168 Ga.App. 278, 308 S.E.2d 693." Whiddon v. Stargell, 192 Ga.App. 826, 828, 386 S.E.2d 88......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT