Ryan v. Baptiste, 38667

Decision Date18 April 1978
Docket NumberNo. 38667,38667
Citation565 S.W.2d 196
PartiesLorene RYAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Pierre J. BAPTISTE et al., Defendants-Appellants. . Louis District,Division Two
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Stephen C. Murphy, Cook & Murphy, Clayton, for defendants-appellants.

Lorene Ryan, pro se.

REINHARD, Judge.

Defendants, Members of the Board of Managers of the Burtonwood Manor Condominium, have appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court granting a mandatory injunction against them and denying their counterclaim for damages. The defendants were ordered to remove locks from the doors of the exterior entrance-ways of the building in which plaintiff's condominium unit was located. Following several occurrences of vandalism and theft, defendants installed locks on the entrance-ways. Keys were provided to unit owners. Plaintiff objects to installation of the locks arguing that the presence of the locks infringed on the easement rights granted in the condominium By-Laws. In addition to granting injunctive relief to plaintiff, the court ruled against defendants on their counterclaim for damages to the locks and doors allegedly caused by plaintiff.

Burtonwood Manor Condominium was created by filing a "Declaration of Condominium By-Laws and Indenture" with the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of St. Louis County, pursuant to § 448.010, RSMo.1969. Plaintiff is one of the original purchasers and owned one of eight units in building 29 of the Burtonwood complex. The By-Laws provide for administration of the condominium by a nine-member Board of Managers. Article 7.1(n) states that among the powers and duties of the Board of Managers are "Promulgation of administrative rules and regulations and such reasonable rules and regulations as it may deem advisable for the use, operation, maintenance, conservation and beautification of the 'Common Elements' and for the health, comfort, safety, and general welfare of the unit owners and occupants of said property".

Easements in and to all common elements are granted to unit owners in § 4.2 of the By-Laws. Maintenance and repair of the common elements is a duty reserved to the Board of Managers in § 7.1(e) of the By-Laws. Any structural alterations deemed "necessary or proper for the maintenance and operation of the property" may be undertaken by the Board "for the benefit of all unit owners" under § 7.1(f) of the By-Laws.

Plaintiff has since sold her condominium unit and no longer lives in Burtonwood. However, live issues remain. Defendants posted a bond pending this appeal, and plaintiff might assert a claim against defendants for damages incurred during the pendency of the appeal and prior to the sale of her unit if the appeal is dismissed for mootness. See Morrison v. Hess, 231 S.W. 997 (Mo. banc 1921). There also remains the matter of defendants' counterclaim against plaintiff. The case is not moot and we will decide it on the merits. Adamick v. Ferguson-Florissant School District, 483 S.W.2d 629 (Mo.App.1972).

This case requires a consideration and balancing of rights of the individual unit owner and of the entire residential community. Members of the Board of Managers are elected by the condominium owners to oversee and protect the rights and interests of the community at large. Accordingly, the Board is vested with considerable discretion with which to execute its managerial and administrative responsibilities. The individual unit owner, though extended certain rights and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Thanasoulis v. Winston Tower 200 Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • December 24, 1986
    ...rule was formulated in Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. Norman, 309 So.2d 180, 182 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1975), and Ryan v. Baptiste, 565 S.W.2d 196 (Mo.Ct.App.1978). See also Johnson v. Hobson, 505 A.2d 1313 Other courts, including one in New Jersey, have looked to the corporation board of direc......
  • Millennium Square Residential Ass'n v. 2200 M St. LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • July 10, 2013
    ...agreement, forego some of the traditional incidents of ownership. [Fairfax Village Condo. IV, 548 A.2d at 91] (quoting Ryan v. Baptiste, 565 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Mo.Ct.App.1978)). Except as otherwise stated in the condominium instruments or by law, the condominium association has the power to r......
  • Thanasoulis v. Winston Towers 200 Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1988
    ...1244 (1983) (by-law amendment limiting to two the number of units in condominium owned by any one person upheld); Ryan v. Baptiste, 565 S.W.2d 196 (Mo.Ct.App.1978) (Board of Directors rule installing locks on exterior entryways upheld); Garrison Apts, Inc. v. Sabourin, 113 Misc.2d 674, 678-......
  • Raymond v. Aquarius Condominium Owners Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 10, 1983
    ...the purpose of creating a uniform plan for the development and operation of the condominium project. See id.; Ryan v. Baptiste, 565 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Mo.App.1978) The evidence in the record shows that the operation of the rental pool was a revenue producer. After the direct expenses of opera......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Chapter 12 - § 12.4 • THE DECLARATION
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Community Association Law: Condominiums; Cooperatives; and Homeowners Associations (CBA) Chapter 12 The Condominium Ownership Act
    • Invalid date
    ...App. 1988); Pooser v. Lovett Square Townhomes Owners' Ass'n, 702 S.W.2d 226, 231 (Tex. App.—Houston 1st Dist., 1985); Ryan v. Baptiste, 565 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Mo. App. 1978). And see Wayne Hyatt & Jo Anne Stubblefield, "The Identity Crisis of Community Associations: In Search of the Appropria......
  • Chapter 2 - § 2.1 • INTRODUCTION
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Community Association Law: Condominiums; Cooperatives; and Homeowners Associations (CBA) Chapter 2 Creation of a Common Interest Community
    • Invalid date
    ...P.3d 718 (Colo. App. 2001). And see Johnson v. Fairfax Vill. Condo. IV Unit Owners Ass'n, 548 A.2d 87 (D.C. App. 1988); Ryan v. Baptiste, 565 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Mo. App. 1978); Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc v. Norman, 309 So.2d 180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). See generally Wayne Hyatt & Jo Anne Stubbl......
  • Creation of a Condominium Community: the Association
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 11-11, November 1982
    • Invalid date
    ...61. Supra, note 25. 62. Id. at 76. 63. Johnson v. Keith, 368 Mass. 316, 331, N.E.2d 879 (1975); 41 Ohio Misc. 69, 322 N.E. 2d 699 (1974); 565 S.W.2d 196 (Mo.App. 1978); 396 N.Y.S. 2d 999, 90 Misc. 2d 1054 (1977); Case No. 76-7912 (17th Jud. Cir., Broward Co. Fla.) (1977); Fountains of Palm ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT