Sanchez v. Beck

Decision Date11 October 2007
Docket NumberNo. 334P07.,334P07.
Citation652 S.E.2d 653
PartiesCornelio Salas SANCHEZ v. Sec. of Corr. Theodis BECK Super. of L.C.I. George Kenworthy.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 5th day of July 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 5th day of July 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cleveland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Jane Doe v. Charlotte–Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 21, 2012
    ...has been appended. See, e.g., Sanders v. State Personnel Com'n, 183 N.C.App. 15, 644 S.E.2d 10,disc. review denied,361 N.C. 696, 652 S.E.2d 653 (2007).3. Federal Courts' Approach Given the lack of guidance in North Carolina cases as to a “colorable constitutional claim[,]” Craig, 363 N.C. a......
  • Sanders v. State Personnel Com'n
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 2, 2009
    ...violations. Sanders v. State Personnel Comm'n, 183 N.C.App. 15, 644 S.E.2d 10 ("Sanders I"), disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 696, 652 S.E.2d 653 (2007). In Sanders I, we stated that the trial court "declined to address defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6)." Id. at 18, 644 S......
  • Carl v. State
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 2, 2008
    ...292. Following Corum, this Court held in Sanders v. State Pers. Comm'n, 183 N.C.App. 15, 644 S.E.2d 10, disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 696, 652 S.E.2d 653 (2007), that "sovereign immunity is not available as a defense to a claim brought directly under the state constitution." Id. at 18, 644 ......
  • Howard v. Cnty. of Durham
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 7, 2013
    ...Personnel Com'n, 183 N.C.App. 15, 19, 644 S.E.2d 10, 13 (citations, quotation marks, and brackets omitted), disc. rev. denied,361 N.C. 696, 652 S.E.2d 653, and app. dismissed,361 N.C. 696, 652 S.E.2d 654 (2007). On a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT