Sandrelli v. State

Decision Date25 February 2015
Docket NumberNo. CR-13-916,CR-13-916
PartiesROBERT LEE SANDRELLI APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE
CourtArkansas Court of Appeals

APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT SMITH DISTRICT [NO. CR-12-1189]

HONORABLE J. MICHAEL FITZHUGH, JUDGE

AFFIRMED

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge

Appellant Robert Lee Sandrelli was convicted by a Sebastian County jury of four counts of rape and was sentenced to four consecutive sentences of 35 years each to be served in the Arkansas Department of Correction. He appeals, asserting that there was insufficient evidence corroborating the victim's testimony.1 Because there is no requirement that a rape victim's testimony be corroborated in order to be sufficient, we affirm.

Our standard of review is well settled. In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, this court determines whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, direct or circumstantial. See Smoak v. State, 2011 Ark. 529, 385 S.W.3d 257. Substantial evidence is evidence forceful enough to compel a conclusion one way or the other beyond suspicion or conjecture. See id. This court views the evidence in the light most favorable tothe verdict, and only evidence supporting the verdict will be considered. See id. We now turn to a review of the evidence primarily as presented by the testimony of the victim, G.H.

G.H. is the fourteen-year-old son of Sandrelli. On his tenth birthday, G.H. was sexually abused by Sandrelli for the first time. Sandrelli continued to sexually abuse G.H. almost weekly thereafter. G.H. described the sexual abuse as acts of oral sex, where Sandrelli would perform oral sex on G.H. and force G.H. to perform oral sex on Sandrelli. G.H. also testified that Sandrelli attempted to rape him anally. In addition to the acts of rape, Sandrelli would physically abuse G.H. G.H. reported that Sandrelli was a heavy drinker and that drinking beer was a contributing factor to both the physical and sexual abuse.

On October 6, 2012, G.H. left Sandrelli's home due to physical abuse from Sandrelli. He went to a neighbor's home and made contact with his sister. He reported to his sister, for the first time, that his father, Robert Sandrelli, was physically and sexually abusing him. She convinced him to contact the police, which he did. Law enforcement investigation of these allegations included interviews, a physical examination of G.H., a search of Sandrelli's home, and submissions to the crime lab. The physical examination of G.H. showed no tangible signs of sexual abuse, and no DNA evidence for Sandrelli was found on items submitted to the crime lab. However, G.H. did have signs of physical abuse on his body, and the search of the home did reveal that there was no food in the refrigerator, only beer.

After trial, Sandrelli was convicted of four counts of rape and was sentenced to a combined total of 140 years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Sandrelli appeals, arguing that there was insufficient evidence to support his rape convictions. More specifically,he contends that there was no corroborating testimony to support the victim's contention that a rape had occurred. To support his argument, he emphasizes the fact that there was no physical evidence of penetration and that DNA evidence that would have corroborated the victim's testimony was not found. He further asserts that evidence was presented that the boy's mother had been trying to regain custody of the victim and that the boy wanted to live with her; in essence, challenging the victim's credibility.

A person commits rape if he or she engages in sexual intercourse or deviate sexual activity with...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • K.B. v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • September 27, 2017
    ...144, 148 (2008). Additionally, there is no requirement that there be scientific evidence of rape. See, e.g., Sandrelli v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 127, at 3, 2015 WL 831195.Here, the victim testified in detail about the events that took place on February 24, 2016, and how both K.B. and C.J.M. ......
  • Sandrelli v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 10, 2016
    ...Robert Sandrelli was convicted of four counts of rape. After our court of appeals affirmed the convictions, see Sandrelli v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 127, 2015 WL 831195, Sandrelli filed a Rule 37 petition alleging three instances of ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court denied ......
  • Sandrelli v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 27, 2017
    ...which resulted in Sandrelli being convicted on all four counts. Our court of appeals affirmed the conviction in Sandrelli v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 127, 2015 WL 831195.Following direct review, Sandrelli filed a petition for postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.......
  • Sandrelli v. State, CR-15-530
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 3, 2015
    ...ORDERED.PER CURIAM Robert Sandrelli was convicted of four counts of rape. Our court of appeals affirmed the convictions. See Sandrelli v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 127. Sandrelli then filed a Rule 37 petition, alleging three instances of ineffective assistance of counsel. The circuit court ente......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT