Satcher v. Grice

Decision Date03 September 1898
Citation31 S.E. 3,53 S.C. 126
PartiesSATCHER et al. v. GRICE et al.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Adverse Possession—Presumption — Disability op Owner —Accrual op Cause op Action—Wills—Title of Devisee.

1. In an action for possession of land which has been held by a stranger for more than 20 years, where there is no evidence that his possession was permissive, or in subordination to plaintiff's rights, it is presumed to have been adverse.

2. Under Code Civ. Proc. § 108, providing that, to prevent or arrest the running of the statute of limitations, a person entitled to commence an action for lands must show a disability "at the time such title shall first descend or accrue, " the fact that plaintiff is a minor when the action is commenced does not arrest the statute, where it has already commenced to run against the one under whom the minor claims.

3. While there is no statute limiting the time for admitting a will to probate, and while Rev St. 1893, § 2006, provides that no devise shall be admitted as evidence until after probate of the will, yet the title of a devisee vests immediately on testator's death, and hence it is from that time that the statute of limitations commences to run against his right of action to recover the land.

Appeal from common pleas circuit court of Edgefield county.

Action by Amos W. Satcher and others against Lucretia Grice and others. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

Croft & Tillman, for appellants.

Sheppard Bros., for respondents.

JONES, J. This is an action to recover the possession of land, and the appeal is from a judgment of nonsuit based on the ground that plaintiffs' action is barred by the statute of limitations. The plaintiffs claimed title to the land in dispute under the will of their grandfather, Amos W. Satcher, Sr., who died in 1842, seised and possessed of the said land. The will was dated January 18, 1842, but was not probated until in May, 1896, a few days before the commencement of this action. The second clause of the will devised the land to his daughters, Lizzie, Cherry, and Nancy, and the third clause devised the same land to them, "to hold jointly as long as they live, ana, should either die without issue, their part to go to the other, and at their death to their brothers and sisters, and to their issues of their bodies." Lizzie and Nancy died previous to 1860, without issue. Cherry married Eldred S. Grice, and died, without issue, in 1871, in possession of the land. Eldred S. Grice remained in possession until his death, in 1895. Some time after the death of his first wife, Cherry, Eldred S. Grice married the defendant Lucretia Grice, who, with her son and co-defendant, have been in possession since his death. The plaintiffs are the children or issue of Ira H. Satcher, Henry Satcher, and Lois Watson, who were children of the testator. These brothers and sisters of Cherry were living at the time of her death, in 1871. Under this will Cherry took a life estate in the land, and at her death the brothers and sisters named took a fee conditional, the words "and to their issues of their bodies" being words of inheritance, and not of purchase. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Bolln v. The Colorado & Southern Railway Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 13 Noviembre 1915
    ...Kapiolani v. Kleghorn, 14 Hawaii 330; Greene v. Anglemire, 77 Mich. 168, 43 N.W. 772; Neel v. McElhenny, 69 Pa. St. 300; Satcher v. Grice, 53 S.C. 126, 31 S.E. 3; Ranch Co. v. Babcock, 24 Utah 183, 66 P. 876; Morse v. Churchill, 41 Vt. 649; Illinois Steel Co. v. Budzisz, 106 Wis. 499, 81 N.......
  • Milton v. Pace
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 30 Marzo 1910
    ... ... 213; Shubrick v. Adams, 20 S.C. 52; Duren v ... Kee, 26 S.C. 219, 2 S.E. 4; Boyd v. Munro, 32 ... S.C. 249, 10 S.E. 963; Satcher v. Grice, 53 S.C ... 126, 31 S.E. 3. The absence of the trustee from the state ... after 1867 was not a statutory disability, nor do we discover ... ...
  • Frady v. Ivester
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 14 Octubre 1924
    ...was adverse from the beginning of her possession in November, 1897. See Ouzts v. McKnight, 114 S.C. 306, 103 S.E. 561; Satcher v. Grice, 53 S.C. 126, 31 S.E. 3. defendant moved for a directed verdict upon the ground, among others, that it appeared from the evidence that the defendant had "e......
  • Taylor v. Jennings
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • 15 Diciembre 1958
    ...The life tenants, under the Will of J. W. Watkins, took directly from him and immediately upon his death. In the case of Satcher v. Grice, 53 S.C. 126, 31 S.E. 3, 4, this Court said: '* * * Since the fee cannot be in abeyance, a devisee of land takes under the will directly from the testato......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT