Sawyer v. Roberts, A93A0522
| Decision Date | 08 June 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. A93A0522,A93A0522 |
| Parties | SAWYER v. ROBERTS. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Goldstein & Redic, Dennis M. Redic, Atlanta, for appellant.
Gill, Peterson & Harris, Allen Harris and Kenneth W. Brosnahan, Atlanta, for appellee.
The appellant, Vera Sawyer, commenced this action against Dr. Marc Roberts, asserting breach of a contract of employment. This appeal follows from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Roberts.
The record shows that on September 16, 1989, Dr. Roberts, a dentist, hired Sawyer as a dental hygienist for his dental practice. Sawyer prepared a written contract of employment for a three-year term, running from September 18, 1989, to September 18, 1992, which both parties executed. This contract provided the terms of Sawyer's remuneration, and that her work hours consisted of a "40 hours work week Monday thru Friday"; however, it was completely silent as to the nature of the services to be rendered, or the place of employment.
Dr. Roberts eventually terminated Sawyer's employment on January 4, 1990. When Sawyer commenced this action seeking to hold him liable for wrongful discharge, Dr. Roberts moved for summary judgment on the grounds that the purported written contract of employment was void for uncertainty and indefiniteness. On appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment for Dr. Roberts on that basis, Sawyer contends that parol evidence was admissible to supply any missing terms of the employment contract.
"The nature and character of the services to be performed, the place of employment and the amount of compensation to be paid therefor are all essential elements of an employment contract and must be stated with sufficient definiteness...." Farr v. Barnes Freight Lines, 97 Ga.App. 36, 37, 101 S.E.2d 906 (1958). If an employment contract contains no description of the nature and character of the services to be performed, or where the performance is to occur, "[i]t is so indefinite and vague that it is unenforceable." McTerry v. Free for All Missionary Baptist Church No. 1, 129 Ga.App. 724, 200 S.E.2d 915 (1973). Parol evidence is not admissible to supply any missing essential elements of a contract required to be in writing by our statute of frauds. Gatins v. NCR Corp., 180 Ga.App. 595, 597, 349 S.E.2d 818 (1986).
As noted above, the employment contract in the instant case was silent as to the nature of the services to be performed...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Moore v. Bank of Fitzgerald
...agreed to such automatic renewal. Such parol evidence is inadmissible in a breach of contract action. See Sawyer v. Roberts, 208 Ga.App. 870, 432 S.E.2d 610 (1993). Appellant further asserts that appellee's refusal to allow appellant to sell part of the security property to reduce her indeb......
-
Haralson v. John Deere Co., No. A03A0583.
...to be in writing by our statute of frauds. Gatins v. NCR Corp., 180 Ga.App. 595, 597, 349 S.E.2d 818 (1986)." Sawyer v. Roberts, 208 Ga.App. 870, 871, 432 S.E.2d 610 (1993). Thus, this Court is not authorized to determine the identity of the principal debtor, of the promisee, or of the prom......
-
Key v. Naylor, Inc., A04A0439.
...matters further by referring to the "Companies." Consequently, it is indefinite and thus unenforceable. Sawyer v. Roberts, 208 Ga.App. 870, 871, 432 S.E.2d 610 (1993). Further, contrary to Key's argument that the provision stating, in effect, that she could work as long as she wanted after ......
-
Colonial Oil Indus., Inc. v. Lynchar, Inc.
...not allow parol evidence to supply a "missing essential element ... required to be in writing," relying upon Sawyer v. Roberts, 208 Ga. App. 870, 871, 432 S.E.2d 610 (1993) [ ("Parol evidence is not admissible to supply any missing essential elements of a contract required to be in writing ......
-
Commercial and Banking Law - Robert A. Weber, Jr.
...for malicious interference as to her right to "procure a lease" under her contract with defendant-broker. Id. 241. Sawyer v. Roberts, 208 Ga. App. 870, 871, 432 S.E.2d 610, 611 (1993). 242. 224 Ga. App. 375, 480 S.E.2d 382 (1997). 243. Id. at 378, 480 S.E.2d at 385. 244. Id. at 377-78, 480 ......