Scarborough v. State, A12A1549.

Decision Date29 August 2012
Docket NumberNo. A12A1549.,A12A1549.
Citation731 S.E.2d 396,317 Ga.App. 523
Parties SCARBOROUGH v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Peter D. Johnson, Augusta, for Appellant.

Rebecca Ashley Wright, Dist. Atty., Charles R. Sheppard, Asst. Dist. Atty., for Appellee.

MILLER, Judge.

Following a bench trial, Jimmy Scarborough was convicted of 21 counts of sexual exploitation of a minor ( OCGA § 16–12–100(b)(8) ). Scarborough filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Scarborough contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; and (2) the trial court erred in admitting photographs as evidence of lustful disposition. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

"On appeal from a criminal conviction, a defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence, and the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the guilty verdict." (Punctuation and footnote omitted.) Goss v. State, 305 Ga.App. 497, 699 S.E.2d 819 (2010).

So viewed, the evidence shows that in approximately July 2008, the property manager of a motel in Augusta, Georgia, was in the process of cleaning out the former property manager's apartment when she found a CD labeled "Jimmy's Pics and Music 2006." The property manager put the CD in a bag with some other items and gave the bag to one of her tenants who was leaving the property. The tenant brought the CD back the next day, complaining that there were some "horrible pictures" on it. The owner of the motel, and the property manager's boss, told the property manager to put the CD in her office, and that he would take care of it later. As the property manager and owner were busy with other matters, the CD was forgotten about and sat in the property manager's desk for several weeks.

Scarborough was a tenant who rented a room at the motel. Scarborough had asked the property manager several times about any paperwork or CDs that had been left in the former property manager's apartment.

On or around August 6, 2008, the property manager's husband, who was the maintenance manager at the motel, located the CD when he was cleaning his wife's desk. The property manager's husband viewed the CD and told his wife what he had seen—pornographic pictures depicting children and adult men, as well as pictures of Scarborough and his family. The property manager and her husband called the police.

The responding officer viewed the CD at the motel property, and as he was exiting the motel office, he was stopped by a woman with a complaint of loud music from one of the motel rooms. The room to which the woman directed him was Scarborough's. After a brief discussion with Scarborough, the responding officer ran his information and discovered that there was an outstanding warrant for Scarborough's arrest. The officer arrested Scarborough and took him into custody.

The officer turned over the CD to an investigator. During his custodial interview, Scarborough admitted that he owned the CD, and that he had downloaded child pornography materials from the Internet.

1. Scarborough contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for three counts of sexual exploitation of a minor. Scarborough specifically argues that the photographs attached to these counts do not depict any lewd exhibition of genitals. We disagree.

Under OCGA § 16–12–100(b)(8), "[i]t is unlawful for any person knowingly to possess or control any material which depicts a minor or a portion of a minor's body engaged in any sexually explicit conduct." The statute defines "sexually explicit conduct" in relevant part as "[l]ewd exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person[.]" OCGA § 16–12–100(a)(4)(D).

All three counts which Scarborough challenges on appeal allege that he knowingly possessed a visual medium which depicted a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, to wit: a lewd exhibition of the genitals and pubic area. The exhibits attached to these three counts depict young girls, in full frontal nudity, standing on a stage. The pubic area of the young girls is clearly exhibited in each photograph. While Scarborough does not dispute the content of the photographs, he nevertheless contends that because the children "may actually have been participants, or perhaps contestants, in some type of pageant," the photographs do not exhibit the children's genital areas in an objectively lewd way.

Though the term ["lewd exhibition of genitals"] has not been defined in Georgia,... unless an act is found not to be lewd as a matter of law, whether such act is lewd under the attendant circumstances usually is best left to a jury for determination. In this case, there was a bench trial. When the trial court sits as the trier of fact, its findings are analogous to a jury verdict and will not be
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Weyer v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 6 Agosto 2015
    ...as a matter of law because the children in them were shown engaging in nonsexual, innocent activities. See Scarborough v. State, 317 Ga.App. 523, 525(1), 731 S.E.2d 396 (2012) (discussing holding in Craft ). Weyer's contention is misplaced. The statutory language of OCGA § 16–12–100(b)(1) p......
  • State v. Al-Khayyal
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 9 Julio 2013
    ...685 S.E.2d 416 (2009) (probation revocation based on possession of a pornographic videotape). 14. See Scarborough v. State, 317 Ga.App. 523, 524–525(1), 731 S.E.2d 396 (2012); Dickerson v. State, 304 Ga.App. 762, 766(2), 697 S.E.2d 874 (2010). 15. See Henderson v. State, 320 Ga.App. 553, 55......
  • Walker v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 6 Marzo 2019
    ...the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the guilty verdict." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Scarborough v. State , 317 Ga. App. 523, 523, 731 S.E.2d 396 (2012).So viewed, the evidence here shows that on December 4, 2012, C. F. was released from the Clayton County jail. As......
  • Daniel v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 2 Agosto 2017
    ...of innocence, and the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the guilty verdict." (Citation omitted.) Scarborough v. State , 317 Ga.App. 523, 731 S.E.2d 396 (2012).So viewed, the evidence shows that in the late evening of August 9, 2014, after smoking methamphetamine together, Da......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT