Schaafs v. Western Union Telegraph Company
| Citation | 215 F. Supp. 419 |
| Decision Date | 02 April 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 60-C-232.,60-C-232. |
| Parties | Jean Pierre SCHAAFS, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Defendant. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Russell A. Eisenberg, Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.
Herman E. Friedrich, Milwaukee, Wis., for defendant.
This diversity of citizenship action for damages allegedly resulting from nondelivery of an interstate telegraph money order has been removed from state court. Defendant has moved to dismiss the action or, in the alternative, to strike portions of the complaint referring to damages beyond the aggregate sum of $500.
Notice of personal injury served on the defendant prior to commencement of the action alleges negligence. The complaint herein sounds in negligence. The parties stipulated on pretrial conference that the factual issue as to liability was predicated on negligence. It is not disputed that the telegraph money order is an interstate message. Liability based on allegations of negligent failure to transmit interstate telegraph messages is limited to that of the contract of transmittal in accordance with federal statute and tariff regulations. Western Union Telegraph Company v. Priester, 276 U.S. 252, 48 S.Ct. 234, 72 L.Ed. 555 (1928); 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 203 and 206; and Western Union Tariff F.C.C. No. 229, paragraph 2(a), issued August 6, 1948, effective September 9, 1948. Under the contract of transmission and federal statute, the limitation of liability and as to recovery in this action is in the amount of $500.
The claim that the limitation on liability and recovery is arbitrary and capricious and constitutes a denial of due process of law to plaintiff must be addressed to the Federal Communications Commission and to Congress, not to this court.
The amount recoverable in this case is less than the requisite jurisdictional amount in diversity of citizenship cases. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, as amended July 25, 1958. The contract limitation on liability is part of an approved rate based upon authorized classification of the interstate telegraph message and is controlled by federal law. This limitation was in effect at the time the message was sent and at the time the complaint was filed. Defendant cannot waive or enlarge the controlling statutory provisions in respect to the rate and classification of the message.
The claimed amount in this case is not merely reduced by defensive pleadings conceded by plaintiff. The limitation on...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Graphnet, Inc., Civ. A. No. 94-4168 (DRD).
...Florida-Texas Frgt., Inc., 357 F.Supp. 977, 979 (D.C.Fla.1973), aff'd, 485 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1973), (citing Schaafs v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 215 F.Supp. 419 (E.D.Wis.1963); Komatz Construction Inc. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 290 Minn. 129, 186 N.W.2d 691 (1971), cert. denied, ......
-
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. TCI Mail, Inc., Civ. A. No. 91-0144L.
...allowance. MCI Tariff, section B, para. 4.02, 21st Revised Page 15. See Pilot Indus., 495 F.Supp. at 360-63; Schaafs v. Western Union Tel. Co., 215 F.Supp. 419, 420 (E.D.Wis.1963). There is no allegation that MCI did not give the credit allowance in this III. CONCLUSION AND ORDER Accordingl......
-
MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Best Telephone Co., Inc.
...Co. v. Florida-Texas Freight, Inc., 357 F.Supp. 977, 979 (S.D.Fla.1973), aff'd 485 F.2d 1390 (5th Cir. 1973); Schaafs v. Western Union Tel. Co., 215 F.Supp. 419 (E.D.Wis.1963). The filed tariff doctrine precludes a customer from raising equitable defenses to the collection of the filed tari......
-
Robert Gibb & Sons, Inc. v. Western U. Tel. Co.
...Minn. 129, 186 N.W.2d 691 (1971); Dowling v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 92 F.2d 864 (1st Cir. 1937); Schaafs v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 215 F.Supp. 419 (E.D.Wis.1963); Lundgren v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 132 F.Supp. 933 (D.Ore.1955). Intrastate transmissions, however......
-
Table of Authorities
...Cir. 1967), 294n22 Santa Fe, County of v. Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M., 311 F.3d 1031 (10th Cir. 2002), 4n9 Schaafs v. West Union Tel. Co., 215 F. Supp. 419 (E.D. Wis. 1963), 62n145 Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co., 485 U.S. 293 (1988), 380n86 Sierra Pac. Power Co., FPC v., 350 U.S. 348 (1956), 1......
-
2 The Traditional Utility Monopoly
...or Indem. Provisions in Telecomms. Tariff Filings, 137 P.U.R.4th 436 (W.Va. Pub. Serv. Comm’n 1992); Schaafs v. W. Union Tel. Co., 215 F. Supp. 419, 420 (E.D. Wis. 1963) (based on statute and tariff); Strauss v. Belle Realty Co., 482 N.E.2d 34, 38 (N.Y. 1985) (holding ConEd not liable for d......