Schwalm v. County of Monroe

Decision Date02 February 1990
Citation158 A.D.2d 994,550 N.Y.S.2d 970
PartiesFrancis J. SCHWALM and Ann V. Schwalm, Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MONROE, Rochester Pure Waters District and City of Rochester, Respondents-Appellants. COUNTY OF MONROE and Rochester Pure Waters District, Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHN P. BELL & SONS, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Chamberlain, D'Amanda, Oppenheimer & Greenfield by Thomas Collins, Rochester, for appellants Schwalms.

Louis N. Kash by Gregory Phillips, Rochester, for respondent-appellant City of Rochester.

Connors, Corcoran, Hall & Meyering by Cheryl Loria-Dinolfo, Rochester, for respondents-appellants County of Monroe and Rochester Pure Waters.

Gibson, McAskill & Crosby by Mark Spitler, Buffalo, for third-party defendant-respondent, John P. Bell & Sons, Inc.

Before CALLAHAN, J.P., and DENMAN, GREEN, BALIO and LAWTON, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Plaintiff Francis Schwalm was injured when he fell from an elevated worksite while building forms and erecting tubular metal framework. Plaintiffs established that there were no railings or other safety devices in place to prevent a worker from falling off the planking on which he was working. Thus, plaintiffs were entitled to partial summary judgment on liability under Section 240(1) of the Labor Law (see, Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc., 65 N.Y.2d 513, 524, 493 N.Y.S.2d 102, 482 N.E.2d 898; Heath v. Soloff Constr. Inc., 107 A.D.2d 507, 487 N.Y.S.2d 617).

Supreme Court also erred in denying the cross motion for summary judgment by the City of Rochester (City) against the County of Monroe (County) and the Rochester Pure Waters District (District) for contractual indemnification. A 1971 lease agreement provides for such indemnification. The City's liability to plaintiffs in the primary action is based solely on its status as owner of the property, and the City had no control or supervision of the worksite (see, Kosiorek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 145 A.D.2d 935, 936, 536 N.Y.S.2d 614; Conway v. New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 141 A.D.2d 957, 959-960, 530 N.Y.S.2d 300).

Plaintiff was working as an employee of John P. Bell & Sons, Inc. (Bell) at the time of the accident. Since Bell is ultimately and vicariously responsible for plaintiff's injuries, it was error for the court to deny the cross motions of the County and the District for common law indemnification (see, McDermott v. City of New York, 50 N.Y.2d 211, 428...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Silver v. Sportsstuff, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 12 Junio 2013
    ...that conditional indemnity can only be awarded after a trial (Lowe v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., 40 A.D.3d 264, 265; Schwalm v. County of Monroe, 158 A.D.2d 994, 994). Rather, conditional indemnity has been often granted by the Courts "notwithstanding the fact that a judgment has yet to be r......
  • Fiske v. Church of St. Mary of the Angels
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • 23 Abril 1992
    ...a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendant exercised control at the construction site); Schwalm v. County of Monroe, 158 A.D.2d 994, 550 N.Y.S.2d 970 (4th Dep't. 1990) (granting of summary judgment based on contractual indemnification clause upheld as defendant owner had no co......
  • Violette v. Armonk Associates, LP
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 10 Diciembre 1992
    ...an indemnity agreement, the party seeking indemnity is entitled to summary judgment over the contractor, Schwalm v. County of Monroe, 158 A.D.2d 994, 550 N.Y.S.2d 970 (4th Dept.1990). Also, in Heath v. Soloff Constr. Inc., 487 N.Y.S.2d 617 (4th Dept.1985), the only liability asserted on the......
  • Brown v. Sagamore Hotel
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 3 Diciembre 1992
    ...1, 358 N.Y.S.2d 685, 315 N.E.2d 751; DeWitt v. Pizzagalli Constr. Co., 183 A.D.2d 991, 992-993, 583 N.Y.S.2d 596; Schwalm v. County of Monroe, 158 A.D.2d 994, 550 N.Y.S.2d 970; Pietsch v. Moog Inc., 156 A.D.2d 1019, 1020-1021, 549 N.Y.S.2d 301; cf., Young v. Casabonne Bros., 145 A.D.2d 244,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT