Scovell v. Delco Oil Co., Inc., 5D01-1004.
Decision Date | 02 November 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 5D01-1004.,5D01-1004. |
Citation | 798 So.2d 844 |
Parties | William H. SCOVELL & Sandra Z. Scovell, Appellants, v. DELCO OIL COMPANY, INC., and Steve Deluca, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Howard L. Cauvel, of Rano, Cauvel & Ceely, P.A., DeLand, for Appellants.
Christopher R. Ditslear, Law Office of Robert Foster, P.A., DeLand, for Appellees.
William H. Scovell and Sandra Z. Scovell (collectively, "Scovells") timely appeal the circuit court's final judgment dismissing with prejudice their complaint for damages against Delco Oil Company, Inc., and Steve DeLuca (collectively, "Delco"). We reverse.
In their complaint, the Scovells alleged that Delco had leased from the Scovells certain real property in Sanford upon which a gas station and convenience store sat, and Delco had breached that lease. The Scovells sought: i) damages in the amount of unpaid rent for the remaining lease term; and ii) additional damages for Delco's failure to remove petroleum storage and dispensing equipment from the property pursuant to the terms of the lease. Together with the complaint, the Scovells attached a copy of the lease and a copy of a Final Judgment For Eviction, entered in county court in Seminole County, which determined that Delco had breached the lease and that the Scovells were entitled to a writ of possession of the leased premises. According to the eviction judgment, Delco breached the lease, by failing to install new petroleum lines, per a lease extension signed by both parties.
Delco moved to dismiss the complaint. Delco argued that the rule against splitting a cause of action requires that all damages sustained or accruing as a result of a single wrongful act must be claimed and recovered in one action or not at all. Delco argued that because the complaint demonstrated that the Scovells had their day in court in Seminole County as it relates to this breach, their attempt to bring another complaint was barred by the rule against splitting causes of action.
The trial court granted Delco's motion to dismiss. The trial court's decision is stated succinctly in the judgment:
The rule against splitting a cause of action requires that all damages sustained by a party as a result of a single wrongful act are lost if not claimed or recovered in one action. See Bryant v. Allstate Ins. Co., 584 So.2d 194, 195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
(citing Gaynon v. Statum, 151 Fla. 793, 10 So.2d 432 (1942)). Affirmative defenses like res judicata (usually used to raise the rule) ordinarily must be pleaded in an answer, and not on a motion to dismiss. See Barbado v. Green & Murphy, P.A., 758 So.2d 1173, 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). An exception is made, however, when the face of the complaint is sufficient to demonstrate the existence of the defense. See Bess v. Eagle Capital, Inc., 704 So.2d 621, 622 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)(citing Duncan v. Prudential Ins. Co., 690 So.2d 687, 688 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Tyson v. Viacom, Inc.
...employment relationship, from pre-contract negotiations to termination, constitutes a single transaction. See Scovell v. Delco Oil Co., 798 So.2d 844, 846 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (landlords did not split cause of action by bringing two separate actions under single lease, one for accelerated pa......
-
AMEC CIVIL LLC. v. State of Fla.
...the parties." Camena Invs. & Prop. Mgmt. Corp. v. Cross, 791 So.2d 595, 596-97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). See also Scovell v. Delco Oil, 798 So.2d 844, 846 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). In the present case, the numerous alleged breaches of the indivisible contract could "with propriety have been litigated ......
-
AMEC Civil, LLC v. State Department of Transportation, Case No. 1D09-1211 (Fla. App. 4/20/2010)
...the parties." Camena Invs. & Prop. Mgmt. Corp. v. Cross, 791 So. 2d 595, 596-97 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). See also Scovell v. Delco Oil, 798 So. 2d 844, 846 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). In the present case, the numerous alleged breaches of the indivisible contract could "with propriety have been litigate......
-
Wilson v. County of Orange
...defense, except when the face of the complaint is sufficient to demonstrate the existence of that defense. Scovell v. Delco Oil Co., 798 So.2d 844, 846 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Count I: The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 The Wilsons argue that the lower court erred in dismissing Count I because they sufficie......
-
Legal theories & defenses
...by a party as a result of a single wrongful act are lost if not claimed or recovered in one action.” Source Scovell v. Delco Oil Co. , 798 So.2d 844 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Yenke , 804 So.2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). §18:250.2 Related Matters 1. Res Judicata: R......