Seaboard Air Line Ry v. United States, 62
Decision Date | 16 March 1920 |
Docket Number | No. 62,62 |
Citation | 65 L.Ed. 1149,41 S.Ct. 611,256 U.S. 655 |
Parties | SEABOARD AIR LINE RY. v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Benjamin Carter, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. Frank Davis, Jr., of Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.
Appellant sued in the Court of Claims to recover balances for transportation services originally payable to the Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad Company, to whose rights it had succeeded through merger or consolidation. Holding that because of section 3477 R. S. (9 Stat. 41, and 10 Stat. 170 [Comp. St. § 6383]) appellant could not maintain the action, that court dismissed its petition.
'All transfers and assignments made of any claim upon the United States, or of any part or share thereof, or interest therein, whether absolute or conditional, and whatever may be the consideration therefor, and all powers of attorney, orders, or other authorities for receiving payment of any such claim, or of any part or share thereof, shall be absolutely null and void, unless they are freely made and executed in the presence of at least two attesting witnesses, after the allowance of such a claim, the ascertainment of the amount due, and the issuing of a warrant for the payment thereof. * * *'
The Seaboard Air Line Railway was originally chartered under the laws of Virginia; by authorized union with others, it became a consolidated corporation under the laws of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama; and in 1903 under 'articles of agreement of merger and consolidation' and the statutes of Georgia and Florida (section 2173, Civil Code Ga. 1895; section 2812, Gen. Stat. Fla.), the Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad, a Florida corporation, was united with it. As agreed and provided by the laws of the two states, the rights, privileges, franchises, and all property, real, personal, and mixed, and all debts on every account, as well as stock subscriptions and other things in action belonging to each of the constituents, were transferred to and vested in the consolidated corporation without further act or deed, 'as effectually as they were in the former companies.'
Section 3477 has been before this court many times for construction and application. United States v. Gillis, 95 U. S. 407, 24 L. Ed. 503; Erwin v. United States, 97 U. S. 392, 24 L. Ed. 1065; Spofford v. Kirk, 97 U. S. 484, 24 L. Ed. 1032; Goodman v. Niblack, 102 U. S. 556, 26 L. Ed. 229; St. Paul, etc., R. R. v. United States, 112 U. S. 733, 5 Sup. Ct. 366, 28 L. Ed. 861; Bailey v. United States, 109 U. S. 432, 3 Sup. Ct. 272, 27 L. Ed. 988; Butler v. Goreley, 146 U. S. 303, 13 Sup. Ct. 84, 36 L. Ed. 981; Hager v. Swayne, 149 U. S. 242, 13 Sup. Ct. 841, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co, s. 35
...In cases of transfer by descent, Erwin v. United States, supra, consolidation of corporations, Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. United States, 1921, 256 U.S. 655, 41 S.Ct. 611, 65 L.Ed. 1149, and purchase at a judicial sale in a corporate reorganization, Western Pacific R. Co. v. United States, ......
-
Farmers State Bank of Riverton v. Riverton Const. Co.
... ... to the proceeds under the Bridge contract with the United ... States were void. Sec. 3477 R. S. U.S. Manhattan v ... United ... States, 97 U.S. 392, 24 L.Ed. 1065; Seaboard Air ... Line v. United States, 256 U.S. 655, 65 L.Ed ... ...
-
New York Guardian Mortgagee Corp. v. Cleland
...Cas. & Surety Co., supra; or certain changes in corporate form in which assets are transferred, Seaboard Airline Rwy v. United States, 256 U.S. 655, 41 S.Ct. 611, 65 L.Ed. 1149 (1921) (consolidation); Consolidated Paper Co. v. United States, 59 F.2d 281 (Ct.Cl.1932) (merger). See generally,......
-
Haddon Hous. Associates LLC v. U.S., 07-646C
...(citing Aetna Casualty, 338 U.S. at 375) (citing in turn Western Pac. R.R. v. United States, 268 U.S. 271 (1925); Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. United States, 256 U.S. 655 (1921);Erwin v. United States, 97 U.S. 392 (1878))). 25.This line of decisions has interpreted Insurance Co. of the West as ......