Secord v. Fischetti

Decision Date04 February 1997
CitationSecord v. Fischetti, 653 N.Y.S.2d 551, 236 A.D.2d 206 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
PartiesIn re Roy W. SECORD III, Petitioner-Appellant, For a Judgment, etc., v. Gennaro FISCHETTI, etc., Respondent-Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

A. Widney Brown, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Jay T. Weinstein, for Respondent-Respondent.

Before MURPHY, P.J., and WALLACH, NARDELLI and WILLIAMS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered December 29, 1995, which denied petitioner's application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent's determination denying petitioner's claim for loss of support under Executive Law, article 22, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent's interpretation of the term "surviving spouse" in Executive Law § 624(1)(b) as not extending to homosexual life partners was not unreasonable and was consistent with prior judicial interpretations of that term (see, Matter of Cooper, 187 A.D.2d 128, 592 N.Y.S.2d 797, appeal dismissed82 N.Y.2d 801, 604 N.Y.S.2d 558, 624 N.E.2d 696).Concerning petitioner's claim for principal support under Executive Law § 624(1)(c), respondent found that the total household income for the three-year period preceding the victim's death was $91,400; that each of the two members was supported in the amount of $45,700 over that period; and that since petitioner's income for that period was $31,000, the majority of his support was derived from his own income.Similarly, with respect to the victim's support of petitioner immediately prior to the victim's death, the victim was earning $398 a week and petitioner $200 a week, again resulting in a finding that petitioner did not receive a majority of his support from the victim.We...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • Raum v. Restaurant Associates, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • Julio 09, 1998
    ...invalidated will). It makes sense to construe the intestacy statute's definition of "surviving spouse" narrowly when the opposing parties are innocent heirs, and broadly when they are tortfeasors. This argument may appear to conflict with Secord v. Fischetti (236 A.D.2d 206, 653 N.Y.S.2d 551, lv. denied 91 N.Y.2d 802, 667 N.Y.S.2d 682, 690 N.E.2d 491), in which we held, without discussion, that it was not unreasonable for the Crime Victims Board to decide that homosexual life partners...
  • Secord v. Fischetti
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • Diciembre 02, 1997
    ... Page 682 667 N.Y.S.2d 682 91 N.Y.2d 802, 690 N.E.2d 491 In Matter of Roy W. Secord v. Gennaro Fischetti NO. 1218 Court of Appeals of New York Dec 02, 1997 236 A.D.2d 206, 653 N.Y.S.2d 551 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR DENIED. Denied. ...
  • Slattery v. City of New York
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • Febrero 08, 1999
    ...504, 509, 596 N.Y.S.2d 839, 842 (2d Dept.1993). The domestic partner, on the other hand, has been denied standing to bring a wrongful death lawsuit. See Raum, 252 A.D.2d at 369, 675 N.Y.S.2d at 343; see also Secord v. Fischetti, 236 A.D.2d 206, 653 N.Y.S.2d 551 (1st Dept.1997) (finding that Crime Victim Board's interpretation of term "surviving spouse" to exclude same sex life partners was rational), lv. denied, 91 N.Y.2d 802, 667 N.Y.S.2d 682, 690 N.E.2d 491 (1997) Seventh,...