Service Fire Ins. Co. v. Powell
Decision Date | 26 November 1943 |
Docket Number | 30057. |
Citation | 27 S.E.2d 896,70 Ga.App. 213 |
Parties | SERVICE FIRE INS. CO. v. POWELL. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
An insured, agreeing with automobile collision insurer to present promptly and prosecute diligently insured's claim, pledged by him to insurer as security for loan against railroad company for damage to automobile as result of collision with train, and appointing insurer's agent as insured's agent to collect, prosecute, compromise, or withdraw such claim, was guilty of breach of contract with insurer in settling and compromising claim and hence liable to insurer for amount loaned.
The Service Fire Insurance Company brought suit against C. Frank Powell to recover $377.61 which the company alleged the defendant owed to it by reason of facts alleged in the petition. The plaintiff alleged that it issued to the defendant a policy of insurance wherein it agreed to pay to the defendant as the insured all damages, less $50, to a described Ford Coupe automobile caused by a collision; that on March 25, 1940, there was a collision between this automobile and a train of the Atlanta, Birmingham and Coast Railroad Company whereby such automobile was damaged in the sum of $377.61, plus $50, which the defendant represented to the plaintiff was caused by the negligent and careless operation of the train by the employees of the railroad company; that on March 28, 1940, the plaintiff advanced as a loan to the defendant the sum of $377.61, taking from the defendant the following agreement designated a "loan receipt," to wit: The plaintiff also alleged that although the defendant in the above instrument agreed to promptly present his claim against the person or corporation as a result of whose negligence the damage to the automobile insured with the plaintiff was caused and to prosecute it with due diligence and also...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rogers v. American Fidelity & Cas. Co.
...Exchange of Chicago Motor Club v. Andersen, 331 Ill.App. 250, 259, 73 N.E.2d 12 (App.Ct.1947); Service Fire Insurance Company v. Powell, 70 Ga.App. 213, 27 S.E.2d 896 (Ct.App.1943); Home Insurance Company v. Bernstein, 172 Misc. 763, 16 N.Y.S.2d 45 (Mun.Ct.1939); Travelers Fire Insurance Co......
-
American Chain & Cable Co., Inc. v. Brunson, 60892
...from a tortious act by a third party. McCann v. Dixie Lake & Co., 44 Ga.App. 700, 162 S.E. 869 (1931); Service Fire Ins. Co. v. Powell, 70 Ga.App. 213, 27 S.E.2d 896 (1943); Green v. Johns, 86 Ga.App. 646, 72 S.E.2d 78 (1952); Clark v. American Cas. Co., 96 Ga.App. 328, 99 S.E.2d 897 (1957)......
-
Hall v. Helms
...insurer to recover to the extent of its payment out of any amount collected by the insured in such an action. Service Fire Ins. Co. v. Powell, 70 Ga.App. 213, 27 S.E.2d 896 (1943); Clark v. American Cas. Co., 96 Ga.App. 328, 99 S.E.2d 897 (1957). The loan receipt does not amount to an assig......
-
Clark v. American Cas. Co.
...the loan receipt are one and the same. There is no material difference in the allegations here and those in Service Fire Ins. Co. v. Powell, 70 Ga.App. 213, 216, 27 S.E.2d 896, 898, the only exception being that in that case the settlement and release of the wrongdoer was made prior to the ......