Severs v. Abrahamson
Decision Date | 15 October 1963 |
Docket Number | No. 51088,51088 |
Parties | Eugene R. SEVERS, d/b/a Macmillan Oil Company, Appellee, v. M. L. ABRAHAMSON, Treasurer, State of Iowa, and Charles R. Dayton, Deputy Treasurer, State of Iowa, Appellants. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Evan Hultman, Atty. Gen., and Frank D. Bianco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Des Moines, for appellants.
Keith E. McWilliams, Des Moines, for appellee.
Plaintiff is a motor vehicle fuel jubber. On April 30, 1962, he deposited his tax remittance for March in a United States mail box in Des Moines. The envelope was postpaid and properly addressed. It bore a postage meter stamp dated April 30, 1962, at Des Moines, Iowa. No other postmark or cancellation appeared on the envelope. The envelope was received in the treasurer's office May 2, 1962. The treasurer assessed a 10% penalty under section 324.64, Code of Iowa, 1958, I.C.A. on the theory the remittance was not postmarked and therefore not filed on time under section 324.60, Code of Iowa, 1958, I.C.A.
Section 324.60, Code of Iowa, 1958, I.C.A. provides:
'The reports and remittances required under this chapter shall be deemed filed within the required time if postpaid, properly addressed and postmarked on or before midnight of the day on which due and payable. * * *'
The above section was enacted by the 57th General Assembly in 1957. It is a known fact that postage meters had been in common business use long before that time. Congress first enacted legislation bearing on the use and handling of postage meters in 1920. Since, then, pursuant to congressional authority, the postmaster general has promulgated rules and regulations bearing on the use and handling of the postage meters and the mail run through them. We take judicial notice of such rules and regulations. Banks v. Carrell, 241 Iowa 786, 791, 43 N.W.2d 142. No one dealing with mail, or providing for use of the postal system, can be heard to say he did not intend the use to be in accord with post office department rules and regulations and the acts of Congress. Only Congress regulates the mails in this country. U.S.Const., art. I, § 8.
We think the General Assembly is charged with such knowledge in enacting section 324.60. It was enacted as a part of a comprehensive revision of the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Law, chapter 164, 57th General Assembly. In the course of the enactment, section 324.67, the General Assembly provided for notices to licensees by registered mail on two occasions, and ordinary mail on one. That the General Assembly is familiar with restricted certified mail, see section 321.501, Code of Iowa, 1958, I.C.A.
Thirty billion pieces of metered mail are handled each year by the post office department, 295,000 postage meter machines are in daily use. Charles Pomeroy Collins in his article, 'The Validity of Postmarks,' in the April, 1961, issue of the American Bar Association Journal, states metered mail represents 45% of all mail and more than half of all business mail. It seems the business community, comprised of those paying the type of tax we have here, finds postage meters expeditious and sufficient for their use.
We are required to construe words and phrases according to the context and the approved usage of the language, technical words and phrases according to their technical meaning. Section 4.1(2), Code of Iowa, 1962, I.C.A. Though 'postmark' is peculiar to the mails it is a word commonly used and understood. It is not necessary to consider it as a technical word.
The most recent definition to come to our attention is in Webster's Third International Dictionary. 'Postmark' as a noun is there defined as, 'an official postal marking on a piece of mail; specifically, a mark showing the name of the post office and the date and sometimes the hour of mailing and often serving as the actual and only cancellation.'
This definition includes both the meter stamp affixed by the sender and the postmark affixed by a post office employee.
A meter stamp is considered a postmark in the following postal regulations.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Maude
...as the actual and only cancelation." Webster's Third New International Dictionary at 1772-73 (1964). See also Severs v. Abrahamson, 255 Iowa 979, 124 N.W.2d 150, 152 (1963); Application of George, 185 Misc. 671, 57 N.Y.S.2d 494, 496 24 C. L. Williams, Superintendent of the Division of Post ......
-
Chevron U.S.A. v. Department of Revenue
...by the USPS sufficient to satisfy the statutory requirement of a date endorsed by the United States post office); Severs v. Abrahamson, 255 Iowa 979, 124 N.W.2d 150 (Iowa 1963) (concluding legislature intended "postmark" to include both USPS and private meter stamps). While we recognize a f......
-
Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. State
...v. Schmidt, 29 Wis.2d 114, 138 N.W.2d 248, 252; City of Grand Island v. Ehlers, 180 Neb. 331, 142 N.W.2d 770, 775; Cf. Severs v. Abramson, 255 Iowa 979, 124 N.W.2d 150. II. The first error assigned by defendant relates to admission of evidence of the amount paid by the State to Texaco Inc. ......
-
Mall Real Estate, L.L.C. v. City of Hamburg
...the future as technology continues to change. Third, words in a statute are to be given their common meaning. Severs v. Abrahamson, 255 Iowa 979, 981, 124 N.W.2d 150, 152 (1963). There is no legal principle that allows the secondary meaning of a word to change the topic of a statutory defin......