Shaw Constr., LLC v. United Builder Servs., Inc.

Decision Date02 February 2012
Citation296 P.3d 145
Docket Number11CA2351
PartiesSHAW CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Third–Party Plaintiff–Petitioner, v. UNITED BUILDER SERVICES, INC.; and MB Roofing, Inc., Third–Party Defendants–Respondents.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Affiniti Colo., LLC v. Kissinger & Fellman, P.C.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • September 12, 2019
    ...P.3d at 646 ; (2) whether the issue would avoid the risk of inconsistent results in different proceedings, see Shaw Constr., LLC v. United Builder Servs., Inc. , 2012 COA 24, ¶ 12, 296 P.3d 145, overruled on other grounds by Goodman v. Heritage Builders, Inc. , 2017 CO 13, ¶ 11, 390 P.3d 39......
  • Rich v. Ball Ranch P'ship
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • January 29, 2015
    ...of law.”); In re M.D.E., 2013 COA 13, 297 P.3d 1058 ; Kowalchik v. Brohl, 2012 COA 25, 277 P.3d 885 ; Shaw Constr., LLC v. United Builder Servs., Inc., 2012 COA 24, 296 P.3d 145. We have also construed court rules under this procedure. Kowalchik, 2012 COA 25, 277 P.3d 885 ; Adams v. Corr. C......
  • Mid Valley Real Estate Solutions V, LLC v. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • August 1, 2013
    ...v. Wolter , 2012 COA 86, ¶ 105, ––– P.3d ––––, 2012 WL 1881002, as is a trial court's summary judgment ruling. Shaw Constr., LLC v. United Builder Servs., Inc. , 2012 COA 24, ¶ 13, 296 P.3d 145.2 B. Analysis¶ 16 Whether Mid Valley falls within the class of plaintiffs who may enforce defenda......
  • Shea Homes, Inc. v. Comm'r, 142 T.C. No. 3
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • February 12, 2014
    ...courts have indicated it means at least the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Shaw Constr., LLC v. United Builder Servs., Inc., 296 P.3d 145, 155-156 (Colo. App. 2012). We conclude that respondent's emphasis on the statutes of repose is misplaced. These statutes determine the time fro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT