Sherwood Medical Industries v. Ward
| Decision Date | 22 April 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. XX-11,XX-11 |
| Citation | 397 So.2d 396 |
| Parties | SHERWOOD MEDICAL INDUSTRIES and General Adjustment Bureau, Appellants, v. Geraldine WARD, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
J. Richard Boehm, of Haas, Boehm, Brown & Rigdon, Orlando, for appellants.
Edward H. Hurt, of Hurt & Parrish, and Bill McCabe, of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Orlando, for appellee.
The employer/carrier appeal from a worker's compensation order awarding a fee of $17,000 to claimant's attorney. We reverse.
The order does not reveal any factors which were considered in determining the amount of the fee; it merely states that the parties agreed that $17,000 was a reasonable fee. The record however does not support the finding that the parties stipulated to the amount of the fee. Appellee argues that the order can still be affirmed because the record shows the award is in accordance with the guidelines set forth in Section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes (1977), and the factors set forth in Lee Engineering and Construction Company v. Fellows, 209 So.2d 454 (Fla.1968). We disagree.
An order awarding attorney's fees must indicate what factors were considered in determining the amount of the fee in order to comport with the requirements of Vargas v. American Bal Harbour, 345 So.2d 1052 (Fla.1976), and Pierce v. Piper Aircraft Corporation, 279 So.2d 281 (Fla.1973). Failure to sufficiently state the basis of the award requires reversal. State of Florida, Sunland Training Center at Miami v. Caldwell, 388 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Casings, Florida, Inc. v. Williams, 389 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Manny's Dresses v. Arias, 390 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
In the present case, since there was no stipulation as to the amount of attorney's fee, the deputy commissioner should have stated in the order what factors were considered in determining the amount of the fee. We do not rule on the merits of the attack on the amount of the attorney's fee.
REVERSED and REMANDED for entry of a proper order.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Department of Health and Rehabilitative Service/Div. of Blind Services v. Bean
...meaningful review. On this basis, we reverse and remand the matter to the DC for entry of a proper order. See Sherwood Medical Industries v. Ward, 397 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Casings, supra; State v. Caldwell, 388 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Manny's Dresses v. Arias, 390 So.2d 124......
-
Metric Constructors, Inc. v. Boyles
...order, this court has summarily reversed, without considering whether the amount awarded is correct. See Sherwood Medical Indus. v. Ward, 397 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Casings, Fla., Inc. v. Williams, 389 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See also Jordan v. American Gypsum, supra. While w......
-
Jordan v. American Gypsum, 92-3852
...representation shall be listed on all attorney's fees awarded by the judge of compensation claims."). See Sherwood Medical Industries v. Ward, 397 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Casings, Florida, Inc. v. Williams, 389 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1st DCA REVERSED AND REMANDED. ZEHMER, C.J., and BOOTH an......