Shmueli v. New York City Police Department

Decision Date27 June 2002
Citation743 N.Y.S.2d 871,295 A.D.2d 271
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesSARIT SHMUELI, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant, and<BR>ROBERT M. MORGENTHAU, as District Attorney of New York County, Respondent.

Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.

Plaintiff's state law claim against District Attorney Morgenthau for negligent hiring, supervision and training was properly dismissed, since plaintiff's General Municipal Law § 50-e notice failed to assert such a claim or allege any facts from which defendant could have gleaned plaintiff's intention to raise such a claim (see, Urena v City of New York, 221 AD2d 429; Brown v New York City Tr. Auth., 172 AD2d 178, 180; St. John v Town of Marlborough, 163 AD2d 761, 763).

Plaintiff's remaining state law claims against District Attorney Morgenthau, seeking to hold him vicariously accountable for the acts or omissions of his subordinates, were also properly dismissed, since claims premised on vicarious liability do not lie against the head of a county agency (see, County Law §§ 54, 941; Barr v County of Albany, 50 NY2d 247, 257).

Plaintiff's claim against District Attorney Morgenthau predicated on 42 USC § 1983 was also properly dismissed, since plaintiff has failed to allege direct participation by him in the alleged wrongful acts, a failure by him to remedy a wrong after discovering it, a policy or custom in the District Attorney's office which encouraged or permitted the alleged wrongful acts, or gross negligence in District Attorney Morgenthau's supervision of his subordinates (see, McKeon v Daley, 101 F Supp 2d 79, 91, affd 8 Fed Appx 138 [2d Cir]).

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Gomez v. Griffin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • March 26, 2021
  • People v. Pagan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 14, 2011
    ...“why defendant, for no apparent reason, would suddenly attack a fellow occupant of a holding cell who had never seen defendant before” (295 A.D.2d at 271, 743 N.Y.S.2d 872). Here, there was an obvious explanation for why, considering the events that had transpired prior to the shooting, def......
  • Rodriguez v. City of New York, 09 Civ. 3642(JSR).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • September 2, 2009
    ...supervisory official cannot be held liable under § 1983 on a theory of respondeat superior."); Shmueli v. N.Y. City Police Dep't, 295 A.D.2d 271, 743 N.Y.S.2d 871, 871-72 (1st Dep't 2002) (dismissing state law claims against district attorney "since claims premised on vicarious liability do......
  • Moore v. the City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 23, 2011
    ...facts from which defendants could have gleaned plaintiffs' intention to raise such a claim ( see Shmueli v. New York City Police Dept., 295 A.D.2d 271, 743 N.Y.S.2d 871 [2002]; see also O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 358, 445 N.Y.S.2d 687, 429 N.E.2d 1158 [1981]...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT