Shroff v. Deaton, 6441.
Decision Date | 31 March 1949 |
Docket Number | No. 6441.,6441. |
Citation | 220 S.W.2d 489 |
Parties | SHROFF et al. v. DEATON. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Gregg County; Earl Roberts, Judge.
Suit by Mrs. Peggy Deaton Shroff and others against Mrs. Melanie Selzer Deaton to recover one-half of a sum of money on deposit with the Kilgore Federal Savings & Loan Association, wherein the Association filed its bill of interpleader and deposited the fund in controversy in registry of the court. From judgment denying plaintiffs any recovery, the plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
John E. V. Jasper, Dallas, for appellants.
W. H. Barnes, Terrell, for appellee.
The appellants, children and heirs at law of K. D. Deaton by a former marriage, brought this suit against the appellee to recover one-half of a sum of money on deposit with the Kilgore Federal Savings and Loan Association. The parties will be referred to as in the trial court and the Kilgore Federal Savings and Loan Association will be referred to as the Association. Defendant was the surviving wife of K. D. Deaton, deceased. After the suit was filed the association filed its bill of interpleader and deposited one-half of the fund in the registry of the court, this being the fund in controversy. Plaintiffs' petition alleged that the money on deposit with the association was the community property of the deceased and of the defendant, and that the plaintiffs as heirs at law of deceased were entitled to one-half of it. The deceased left a written will which had been probated, but it was admitted by the parties that the will did not dispose of the fund on deposit with the association.
The case was tried before the court without a jury. The judgment entered denied plaintiffs any recovery and allowed an attorney's fee to be paid to the association out of the fund deposited in the registry of the court. There is no appeal from that part of the judgment allowing attorney's fees but the plaintiffs appeal from the judgment denying them recovery for one-half of the fund, as sued for in their petition.
After the judgment had been entered the court filed its findings of fact and conclusions of law, as requested by the plaintiffs. The findings material to this decision are as follows:
The court's conclusions of law are as follows:
No statement of facts has been brought up on appeal. The first point presented for reversal is that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Stauffer v. Henderson
...327, 329 (Tex.Civ.App.--Galveston 1939, writ ref'd); see Adams v. Jones, 258 S.W.2d 401 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1953, no writ); Shroff v. Deaton, 220 S.W.2d 489 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1949, no writ). The power of joint owners to agree to a right of survivorship, implicit in the 1848 statute......
-
Hilley v. Hilley
...... In Shroff v. Deaton, Tex.Civ.App., 220 S.W.2d 489 (no writ), community funds were deposited in a savings and ......
-
Vanity Fair Properties v. Billingsley
...351 S.W.2d 382 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1961, no writ); Foran v. Smith, 228 S.W.2d 251 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1950, no writ); Shroff v. Deaton, 220 S.W.2d 489 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1949, no By one point of error called Preliminary Point No. 1, appellant complains that the trial court er......
-
Pollard v. Steffens
...decree, was familiar with the decisions in the case of Chandler v. Kountze, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 327, wr. ref., and Shroff v. Deaton, Tex.Civ.App., 220 S.W.2d 489. He says that it was not until three years later in 1956 that he became aware of this mistake, shortly before filing this bi......