Sims v. McMullan
Decision Date | 06 November 1929 |
Docket Number | (No. 3302.) |
Citation | 22 S.W.2d 313 |
Parties | SIMS et al. v. McMULLAN et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Garza County; Gordon B. McGuire, Judge.
Suit by Helen T. McMullan and others against V. B. Sims and another. Decree for complainants, and defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded.
Leon Moses, of Post, and Bean & Klett, of Lubbock, for appellants.
J. M. Harris, of Snyder, and Douglas & Scott, of Lubbock, for appellees.
This suit was instituted by Mrs. Helen T. McMullan and her sister, Mrs. Beverley S. McMullan, joined pro forma by their respective husbands, against V. B. Sims, his brother, L. R. Sims, and their mother, Mrs. Laura Sims, a widow, and the First National Bank of Post. The purpose of the action is to have the will of E. C. Sims, the father of plaintiffs, construed and declared void, and to recover the property mentioned in the will from V. B. Sims, an uncle of plaintiffs, who was appointed by the testator, E. C. Sims, trustee and independent executor.
Plaintiffs Mrs. Helen T. McMullan and Mrs. Beverley S. McMullan allege: That they are the only children of the deceased, E. C. Sims, by his first wife, Gladys Johnson Sims. That, prior to the death of the said E. C. Sims, he had been divorced from their mother, Gladys Johnson Sims, and in connection with the divorce proceedings their mother had received her full share of all community property, and had released her husband, E. C. Sims, from all claims she may have had to any of his property. That all property which passed into the hands of V. B. Sims in virtue of the will was the separate property of E. C. Sims at the time of his death. That, although E. C Sims, after being divorced from his first wife, had married a second time, said second marriage was childless, and, subsequent to his death, settlement had been made with said second wife, who had no interest whatever in the subject-matter of this suit. That at the time of his death E. C. Sims was survived by several brothers, by his father, S. D. Sims, and his mother, Mrs. Laura Sims. That soon after the death of E. C. Sims his father died, and it appears that no action was taken to substitute in his stead a coexecutor.
In view of the contentions of plaintiffs that the will is too vague, indefinite, uncertain, and speculative to effect a testamentary disposition of the testator's estate, and that it is void, in that it violates the rule against perpetuities, we set out the will in full, as follows:
The court's findings of fact are very full, but for our present purposes it is sufficient to say that it is found that from and after December 16, 1916, V. B. Sims had appropriated the land owned by testator exclusively to his own use and benefit, thus, in effect, repudiating the trust, and further that in January, 1929, prior to the filing of this suit, he expressly denied the right of the plaintiffs to any of the land and claimed exclusive title and ownership to all real estate in himself. These findings are supported by the evidence and obviate the necessity of plaintiffs making application to the executors or to V. B. Sims for financial assistance, because of their needs, prior to the institution of the suit. The law does not require a vain thing, and when V. B. Sims asserted absolute ownership of the land included in the estate, to the exclusion of all others, it would have been an idle formality for the plaintiffs to have applied to him for financial aid and help, because it may be inferred that the request would have been denied them; therefore we overrule the contention that the suit was prematurely...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jennings v. Jennings
...219. Other courts have also held the word to include real estate. In re Arnolt's Estate, 127 Misc. 579, 217 N.Y.S. 323; Sims v. McMullan, Tex.Civ.App., 22 S.W.2d 313. Jewett v. State, 94 Ind. 549. We recently held Lane v. Railey, 280 Ky. 319, 133 S.W.2d 74, that the word 'cash' included not......
-
In re Young
...scheme of the will is to be avoided. Long v. Long, 252 S.W.2d 235, 247 248 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texarkana 1952) citing to Sims v. McMullan, Tex.Civ.App., 22 S.W.2d 313 (1929), reversed by Supreme Court on other grounds, McMullen v. Sims, Tex.Com.App., 37 S.W.2d 141; Vogt v. Meyer, Tex.Civ.App., 16......
-
Jennings v. Jennings; Same v. Jennings' ex'R
...219. Other courts have also held the word to include real estate. In re Arnolt's Estate, 127 Misc. 579, 217 N.Y.S. 323; Sims v. McMullan, Tex. Civ. App., 22 S.W. 2d 313. Jewett v. State, 94 Ind. 549. We recently held in Lane v. Railey, 280 Ky. 319, 133 S.W. 2d 74, that the word "cash" inclu......
-
Ball v. Ball, 10434
...should be construed in accordance with the evident intent of the testator to mean both real and personal property. In Sims v. McMullan, Tex.Civ.App., 22 S.W.2d 313, the Court held that reference in a will to a trustee as a legatee and to 'funds of estate' should be construed to include both......