Sirk v. Plante
Decision Date | 27 October 1965 |
Citation | 349 Mass. 770,211 N.E.2d 341 |
Parties | Joel SIRK v. Edward M. PLANTE. |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Louis Kerlinsky, Springfield, for plaintiff.
Edwin C. Satter, III, Wilbraham, for defendant.
Before SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
In this action of tort the plaintiff, a United States letter carrier, seeks to recover for injuries sustained by him on premises owned and controlled by the defendant.There was testimony that on December 18, 1961, at about 9 A.M., the plaintiff was delivering mail to the defendant's premises.It had snowed that morning and there were about three inches of snow and ice frozen on the front stairway at the time.After the plaintiff delivered the mail and while descending the stairway he slipped and fell on snow and ice which covered the stairway.Snow and freezing rain were falling at the time.There was no error in directing a verdict for the defendant.Se...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Swann v. Flatley
...applies to this case. In a rescript opinion entered by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, that court observed Sirk v. Plante, 349 Mass. 770, 211 N.E.2d 341 (1965) In this action of tort the plaintiff, a United States letter carrier, seeks to recover for injuries sustained by him on p......
- Com. v. DeSimone
- Fitzsimmons v. Dooley
- Sandberg v. Board of Appeals of Taunton