Smith v. Bramhall

Decision Date01 March 1978
Docket NumberNo. B-7147,B-7147
PartiesGene SMITH, Trustee and Independent Executor, Petitioner, v. Mildred Ann BRAMHALL, Individually a/n/f, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Clark Langford, Waxahachie, for petitioner.

Don R. Stout and Gene Knize, Waxahachie, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is denied with the notation, "Refused. No Reversible Error." Our action should not be interpreted as approving the conclusion of the Court of Civil Appeals that "unpaid child support is . . . a debt for which judgment may be taken." 556 S.W.2d 112, 113. Section 14.09(c) of the Texas Family Code provides only that unpaid child support may be reduced to judgment and enforced by the same means as a judgment for a debt, not that such sums are debts.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Huff v. Huff
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • 16 Marzo 1983
    ...for indebtedness. Id. at 514; see also Smith v. Bramhall, 556 S.W.2d 112 (Tex.Civ.App. Waco 1977) writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam, 563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.1978) (making the same distinction between § 14.09(c) and a collateral claim for a The inference to be drawn from this Court's writings in Adai......
  • Ex parte McNemee, 7024
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 13 Agosto 1980
    ...child support arrearage is not a "debt" in recognition of the constitutional prohibition against imprisonment for debt. Smith v. Bramhall, 563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.1978). Thus, until a judgment is obtained under Tex. Family Code Ann. Sec. 14.09(c), Article 5529, the "catch-all" four-year statute......
  • Ex parte Payne
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 15 Enero 1980
    ...It probably made that determination in recognition of the constitutional prohibition against imprisonment for debt. Smith & Bramhall, 563 S.W.2d 238 (Tex.1978). It is our opinion, however, that the cause of action for the collection of child support arrearage falls within the purview of Art......
  • Interest of Gonzalez
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 10 Marzo 1999
    ...because arrearages have been reduced to a judgment that is enforceable in the same way as a judgment for a debt. See Smith v. Bramhall, 563 S.W.2d 238, 239 (Tex. 1978); Ex parte Wilbanks, 722 S.W.2d 221, 224 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 1986, orig. proceeding); Ex parte Shaver, 597 S.W.2d 498, 500-0......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT