Smith v. Smith

Decision Date03 July 1979
Docket NumberNo. 7821DC1017,7821DC1017
Citation42 N.C.App. 246,256 S.E.2d 282
CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals
PartiesJames A. SMITH v. Doris C. SMITH.

Westmoreland & Sawyer by Rebecca L. Connelly and Barbara C. Westmoreland, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy & Kennedy, Winston-Salem by Annie Brown Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court committed error in granting plaintiff an absolute divorce when the plaintiff's evidence and the defendant's evidence showed that the plaintiff was living in an adulterous relationship at the time of trial and had continuously lived in adultery since the separation of the parties. We find no error and affirm the judgment entered by the trial court.

Defendant contends that the central issue presented on this appeal is whether it was proper for the trial court to exclude all evidence tending to establish an adulterous relationship on the part of the plaintiff, because the defendant failed to file answer. We do not agree. To us, the central issue is whether recrimination is a defense at all to the plaintiff's action for absolute divorce.

G.S. 50-6 provided at the time of trial:

"Divorce after separation of one year on application of either party. Marriages may be dissolved and the parties thereto divorced from the bonds of matrimony on the application of either party, if and when the husband and wife have lived separate and apart for one year, and the plaintiff or defendant in the suit for divorce has resided in the State for a period of six months. This section shall be in addition to other acts and not construed as repealing other laws on the subject of divorce. A plea of res judicata or of recrimination with respect to any provision of G.S. 50-5 shall not be a bar to either party obtaining a divorce on this ground : Provided that no final judgment of divorce shall be rendered under this section until the court determines that there are no claims for support or alimony between the parties or that all such claims have been fully and finally adjudicated." (Emphasis added.)

The change in the above statute became effective on 1 August 1977, a few months before the complaint was filed in this action. The statute is clear that "(a) plea of res judicata or of recrimination with respect to any provision of G.S. 50-5 shall not be a bar to either party obtaining a divorce on this ground . . . ." This sentence was rewritten by the General...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Edwards v. Edwards
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • October 16, 1979
    ...Since the present action was filed on 10 July 1978, the defense of recrimination was not available to defendant. Smith v. Smith, 42 N.C.App. 246, 256 S.E.2d 282 (1979). Defendant in the case before us has argued that since some of the alleged adulterous acts on the part of the plaintiff occ......
  • Boone v. Boone
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 1979
    ...v. Edwards, 43 N.C.App. 296, 259 S.E.2d 11 (1979); Gerringer v. Gerringer, 42 N.C.App. 580, 257 S.E.2d 98 (1979); Smith v. Smith, 42 N.C.App. 246, 256 S.E.2d 282 (1979). The trial judge properly struck the abandonment defense. His order Affirmed. WEBB and HARRY C. MARTIN, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT