Smith v. State, 93-2401

Decision Date24 March 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-2401,93-2401
Citation634 So.2d 225
Parties19 Fla. L. Weekly D640 Frank A. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Office of Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

ERVIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because the trial court failed to properly credit appellant's sentence for attempted burglary with time previously served, we reverse and remand with directions to grant the motion and correct appellant's sentence.

Appellant was convicted of attempted burglary, a third degree felony, fleeing a police officer and reckless driving, both of which are misdemeanors, and was sentenced to three years' incarceration followed by two years' probation, and to 60 days and 85 days, respectively on the misdemeanor offenses. The trial court gave credit for 60 and 85 days on the misdemeanor charges, but failed to grant any credit for time served on the felony charge. This was error.

Section 921.161, Florida Statutes (1991), provides that a court imposing a sentence shall allow a defendant credit for all time served in county jail before imposition of sentence. Although this statute does not require the courts to grant credit for time served before conviction on each consecutive sentence imposed at the same time, 1 the courts must give credit for time served on each concurrent sentence imposed at the same time. Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986); Vasquez v. State, 478 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), cause dismissed, 488 So.2d 831 (Fla.1986); Bell v. State, 573 So.2d 10 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

The order denying appellant's motion requesting credit for time served on his felony conviction is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED with directions to grant the motion and correct appellant's sentence.

MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hurt v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 1 Abril 1996
    ...Count IV, reckless driving, are felonies when, in fact, they are misdemeanors. §§ 316.192 and 322.34, Fla.Stat. (1993); Smith v. State, 634 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, the written judgment must be corrected. Further, the written order of probation for reckless driving does n......
  • Kelsey v. State, 94-1420
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 3 Julio 1995
    ...Statutes, the trial court must grant credit for jail time served on each concurrent sentence imposed at the same time. Smith v. State, 634 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, this cause is remanded with directions to strike the costs of $225.00 and $27.50, and to credit the term imp......
  • Jones v. State, 95-2563
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 4 Septiembre 1996
    ...jail time credit. See Daniels v. State 491 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986); Stevens v. State, 651 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Smith v. State, 634 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). STONE and PARIENTE, JJ., ...
  • Tisdale v. State, 94-700
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 11 Julio 1995
    ...appellant's sentencing after revocation of probation. We affirm the trial court's award of credit for time served. Smith v. State, 634 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). The revocation order, however, is vacated, and we remand to the trial court to conform the listed violations in the written r......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT