Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Edwards

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
Citation253 Ky. 727,70 S.W.2d 1
PartiesSOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. v. EDWARDS.
Decision Date09 January 1934

70 S.W.2d 1

253 Ky. 727

SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.
v.
EDWARDS.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

January 9, 1934


Rehearing Denied May 1, 1934.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Webster County.

Action by Frank Edwards, by his next friend, Leamon Edwards, against the Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Reversed, with directions.

Trabue, Doolan, Helm & Helm, of Louisville, J. M. Rayburn, of Dixon, and J. C. Cannaday, of Providence, for appellant.

Withers & Lisman, of Dixon, for appellee.

CREAL, Commissioner.

On June 22, 1931, Frank Edwards, a youth about 18 years of age, while riding on the running board of a truck driven by James Humphrey, Jr., along Dixon street in Providence, Ky. came in contact with a telephone pole of the Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company and sustained severe injuries. He instituted this action by his father and next friend, and has recovered judgment against the company for $1,500, and it is appealing.

In the petition it is alleged that appellant negligently and wrongfully placed and maintained its telephone poles and especially the pole with which he came in contact in such close proximity to the traveled portion of the street as to render it dangerous and unsafe to persons using the street; that at the time of the accident and for many months prior thereto, appellant knew or by the exercise of ordinary care could have known of the dangerous and unsafe condition in which the pole was placed and maintained.

The first paragraph of appellant's answer is a general denial of the allegations of the petition. In a second paragraph it pleads contributory negligence, and in a third paragraph and in an amended answer it is alleged that the accident was caused solely by the concurrent negligence of appellee and the driver of the automobile. The issues were completed by an agreed order treating the affirmative matter in the answer as amended as controverted of record.

The evidence shows in substance that appellee and young Humphrey who was driving his father's milk truck decided to go bathing. They drove to a drug store to procure a bathing suit belonging to one of the boys and there met two young ladies. At the suggestion of some of the party, the young ladies were taken for a short drive out Dixon street. They got in the seat with Humphrey, and appellee stood on the right running board, holding to a handle of the door of the truck. While riding in this position, he came in contact with one of appellant's poles with such violence that he was knocked off the running board and sustained a fracture of the skull, total loss of sight in the right eye, and great impairment of the vision of the other.

The street at and near the scene of the accident is 22 or 23 feet in width and surfaced with rock asphalt with a concrete gutter and curb on either side. The concrete gutters are [70 S.W.2d 2] 18 inches wide and have the same slope as other portions of the street, thereby forming a part of the traveled portion of the street. The curb is 6 inches high, and is about the same thickness, but is rounded off at the top next to the street.

Leamon Edwards, father of appellee, testified that the space between the outer edge of the curb and the nearest portion of the base of the telephone pole was 3 inches and others testified to the same effect. Witnesses for appellant testified that this space was about 9 inches, but it is not clear whether they refer to the outer edge of the curb or to the inside, defining the traveled portion of the street; however, we assume from the questions asked they refer to the distance from the traveled portion of the street. Uncontradicted evidence shows that the telephone pole leans toward the street and that a plumb line dropped from the edge of the pole nearest the curb 6 feet from the ground would fall on the curb about one inch from the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Berry v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Dry Goods Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • April 12, 1948
    ...... Austin Hall, Clay C. Rogers and Mosman, Rogers, Bell & Field for appellant Emery, Bird, Thayer Dry Goods. ... Clinkenbeard v. St. Joseph, 10 S.W.2d 54;. Southern Bell Tel, Co. v. Edwards, 253 Ky. 727, 70. S.W.2d 1; ......
  • Fiechter v. City of Corbin
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kentucky
    • May 8, 1934
    ......(two cases). WHITAKER v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al. Court of Appeals of ... 227 Ky. 690, 13 S.W.2d 1022; Raines v. East Tenn. Tel. Co., 150 Ky. 670, 150 S.W. 830; Bevis v. Vanceburg. ...(N. S.) 199;. Southern Bell Tel. & Teleg. Co. v. Edwards, 253 Ky. 727, 70 S.W.2d 1. To the same effect see ......
  • Fiechter v. City of Corbin
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (Kentucky)
    • May 8, 1934
    ......(two cases). . Whitaker . v. . Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company et al. . Court of ...690, 13 S.W. (2d) 1022; Raines v. East Tenn. Tel. Co., 150 Ky. 670, 150 S.W. 830; Bevis v. Vanceburg Tel. ...(N.S.) 199; Southern Bell Tel. & Teleg. Co. v. Edwards, 253 Ky. 727, 70 S.W. (2d) 1. To the same effect see ......
  • Blackmer v. COOKSON HILLS ELEC. CO-OP, INC.
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • November 14, 2000
    ...the ordinary use thereof by the traveling public.'" Id. at ¶ 18, 79 P.2d at 815 (quoting Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Edwards, 253 Ky. 727, 70 S.W.2d 1 (1934)). A utility company that maintains "wires in or over public streets ... must use commensurate care in their erection, inspection......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT