Southern Ry. Co. v. Day
Decision Date | 16 November 1926 |
Docket Number | 12102. |
Citation | 138 S.E. 870,140 S.C. 388 |
Parties | SOUTHERN RY. CO. v. DAY. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Greenville County; John S Wilson, Judge.
Action by the Southern Railway Company against A. F. Day. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The exceptions are set out below as directed by GARY, C.J., in his dissenting opinion:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wallace v. Quick
... ... Powers v. Smith, 80 S.C. 114, 61 S.E. 222; ... In re Russell's Estate, 118 S.C. 420, 110 S.E ... 791, 793; Glenn v. Walker, 113 S.C. 1, 100 S.E. 706; ... Whitaker v. Jeffcoat, 128 S.C. 404, 122 S.E. 495, ... 496; Kirton v. Howard, 137 S.C. 11, 134 S.E. 859, ... 867; Southern Railroad Co. v. Day, 140 S.C. 388, 138 ... S.E. 870, 878 ... But I ... am relieved of making a decision on this point for in the ... Sibley Case the Court passed on a similar situation and still ... applying that decision here, whatever rights Eli English ... acquired ... ...
-
Townsend v. South Carolina Ins. Co.
... ... ... Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven, 215 U.S ... 252, 30 S.Ct. 78, 54 L.Ed. 179; Id., 77 S.C. 493, 58 S.E ... 424: "Estoppel arises when one does some act precluding ... him from averring anything to contrary.--Southern Ry. Co. v ... Day, 140 S.C. 388, 396; 138 S.E. 870." ... "Equitable ... estoppel" arises from conduct and prevents assertion of ... technical rights contrary to equity and good conscience ... Smith v. Williams, 141 S.C. 265, 281, 282, 139 S.E ... 625, 54 A. L. R. 964 ... ...
-
Oswald v. Aiken County
... ... It claims the charge was erroneous in two particulars. First, it claims the judge gave an erroneous charge on the law of estoppel by silence. We have reviewed that charge and find it is entirely in accord with the law of this State. See Southern Railway Co. v. Day, 140 S.C. 388, 138 S.E. 870 (1926); Ridgill v. Clarendon County, 192 S.C. 321, 6 S.E.2d 766 (1939). 5 ... Second, the County asserts the judge erred because he gave only a partial statement of the elements of estoppel when he repeated the definition of estoppel ... ...
-
Walker v. Hannon
... ... Common Pleas for Spartanburg County,to wit: The receivership ... proceedings of J. N. Cudd, entitled C. H. Dixon, etc., ... Plaintiff, v. J. N. Cudd et al., Defendants, and the ... receivership proceedings of J. J. Cudd, [191 S.C. 16] ... entitled Southern Trust Company, etc., Plaintiff, v. J. J ... Cudd, etal., Defendants. The record fails to explain why, or ... how, the caption of the case now before this Court became ... entitled L. P. Walker, appellant, versus R. A. Hannon and ... John L. Lancaster, as Receivers of J. N. Cudd, Jesse W. Boyd, ... ...