Sparrow v. American Fire & Cas. Co.
| Decision Date | 02 November 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 307,307 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | I. J. SPARROW, Jr., trading as Sparrow's Super Market, v. AMERICAN FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY (Original Party Defendant) and Commercial National Bank of Kinston, North Carolina (Additional Party Defendant). |
LaRoque & Allen, Kinston, for plaintiff, appellant.
White & Aycock, Kinston, for defendant Ins. Co., appellee.
The plaintiff insists that he is entitled to recover under the comprehensive clause--'Coverage F,' which binds the insurance company to pay for 'any direct and accidental loss of or damage to the automobile. * * * ' However, to recover under this clause, it is noted that the loss or damage must be both 'direct' and 'accidental.' In the case at hand, the facts agreed establish no element of 'accidental' loss or damage as that term is commonly understood and also well defined in our decisions. See Fletcher v. Security Life & Trust Co., 220 N.C. 148, 16 S.E.2d 687; Kirkley v. Merrimack Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 232 N.C. 292, 59 S.E.2d 629.
Nor is the plaintiff entitled to recover under the Theft (Broad Form) clause--'Coverage I,' which binds the insurance company to pay for loss or damage to the automobile caused by 'theft, larceny, robbery or pilferage.' The facts agreed do not bring the case within the meaning of this clause. See Hanes Funeral Home v. Dixie Fire Ins. Co., 216 N.C. 562, 5 S.E.2d 820; U Drive It Auto Co. v. Atlantic Fire Ins. Co., 239 N.C. 416, 80 S.E.2d 35.
Where, as here, a case is tried on an agreed statement of facts, such statement is in the nature of a special verdict, admitting there is no dispute as to the facts, and constituting a request by each litigant for a judgment which each contends arises as a matter of law on the facts agreed, and consequently the court is not permitted to infer or deduce further facts from those stipulated. U Drive It Auto Co. v. Atlantic Fire Ins. Co., supra.
The decisions relied on by the plaintiff are distinguishable.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ahoskie Production Credit Ass'n v. Whedbee
...832; Eason v. Dew, 244 N.C. 571, 94 S.E.2d 603; Town of Blowing Rock v. Gregorie, 243 N.C. 364, 90 S.E.2d 898; Sparrow v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 243 N.C. 60, 89 S.E.2d 800; Marx v. Brogan, 188 N.Y. 431, 81 N.E. 231, 11 Ann.Cas. 145; 2 Am. Jur. 384. Especially is this true when the ag......
-
City of Reidsville v. Citizens Development Corp., 674
...and consequently the court is not permitted to infer or deduce further facts from those stipulated.' Sparrow v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 243 N.C. 60, 62, 89 S.E.2d 800, 801. Where agreed facts are insufficient to determine the controversy, the cause will be remanded for further proceed......
-
Town of Blowing Rock v. Gregorie
...by each litigant for a judgment which each contends arises as a matter of law on the facts agreed * * *. ' Sparrow v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 243 N.C. 60, 89 S.E.2d 800, 801. The lower court decided the case, and rendered judgment, upon the stipulations agreed upon by the parties. Que......
-
Pleasant v. Motors Ins. Co.
...to his father, the named insured, so as to preclude recovery. In support of this argument defendant cites Sparrow v. American Fire & Casualty Co., 243 N.C. 60, 89 S.E.2d 800, which holds that an employer could not recover on an insurance policy for the loss of an automobile which was tortio......