Spaziano v. Dugger, s. 74675
Decision Date | 15 March 1990 |
Docket Number | Nos. 74675,74686,s. 74675 |
Citation | 557 So.2d 1372 |
Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly S151 Joseph Robert SPAZIANO, Petitioner, v. Richard L. DUGGER, Respondent. Joseph Robert SPAZIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Edward S. Stafman, Tallahassee, for petitioner/appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Margene A. Roper and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent/appellee.
Joseph Robert Spaziano petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus, appeals the trial court's denial of his third motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and requests a stay of execution. We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution, and deny all relief.
This is the fifth time that Spaziano has been before this Court. Spaziano v. State, 393 So.2d 1119 (Fla.) (Spaziano I ), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1037, 102 S.Ct. 581, 70 L.Ed.2d 484 (1981) ( ); Spaziano v. State, 433 So.2d 508 (Fla.1983) (Spaziano II ), aff'd, 468 U.S. 447, 104 S.Ct. 3154, 82 L.Ed.2d 340 (1984) (affirmed death sentence); Spaziano v. State, 489 So.2d 720 (Fla.) (Spaziano III ), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995, 107 S.Ct. 598, 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) ( ); Spaziano v. State, 545 So.2d 843 (Fla.1989) (Spaziano IV ) ( ).
In these prior decisions, we have addressed the subject matter of each of the claims Spaziano presents in the instant proceedings. We find that Spaziano's contention of ineffective assistance of counsel is procedurally barred. Spaziano IV. While we considered the nonstatutory mitigating evidence as Lockett * claims in Spaziano II, III, and IV, we address, in the instant proceedings, the argument that the trial judge, at resentencing, was unaware that he could consider nonstatutory mitigating circumstances as later made clear by Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987). However, we reject that argument because, prior to sentencing, the judge had announced that, under Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 98 S.Ct. 2954, 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (1978), he felt that he must allow the introduction of nonstatutory mitigating evidence. It would be incredible to conclude that the judge would feel that nonstatutory mitigating evidence could be introduced but that he could not consider it.
In any event, even if it could be said that the judge was under a misapprehension, it is evident that any error would be harmless. The presentence investigation report specifically considered by the judge at sentencing contained substantial evidence concerning Spaziano's mental condition. The judge declined to view such evidence as constituting a statutory mitigating circumstance, and this Court affirmed in Spaziano II. In that case, we expressly rejected Spaziano's Lockett argument. The United States Supreme Court affirmed Spaziano II by a written opinion in Spaziano v. Florida, 468 U.S. 447, 104 S.Ct. 3154, 82 L.Ed.2d 340 (1984).
Further, as we held in Spaziano IV, the nonstatutory evidence that Spaziano contends was not introduced in his sentencing proceeding was cumulative. We have no doubt that the judge's decision would have been the same regardless of whether or not he knew that such evidence could be considered as nonstatutory mitigating evidence.
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's denial of Spaziano's rule 3.850 motion and deny Spaziano's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The stay previously entered is vacated. We will entertain no petition for rehearing.
It is so ordered.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spaziano v. Singletary
...107 S.Ct. 598, 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986) (Spaziano III ); Spaziano v. State, 545 So.2d 843 (Fla.1989) (Spaziano IV ); Spaziano v. Dugger, 557 So.2d 1372 (Fla.1990) (Spaziano V ); Spaziano v. State, 570 So.2d 289 (Fla.1990) (Spaziano VI ); and Spaziano v. Dugger, 584 So.2d 1 (Fla.1991) (Spaziano......
-
Davis v. State
...issue to have no merit. E.g., Engle v. Dugger, 576 So.2d 696 (Fla.1991); Bolender v. Dugger, 564 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1990); Spaziano v. Dugger, 557 So.2d 1372 (Fla.1990); Harich v. State, 542 So.2d 980 (Fla.1989); Card v. Dugger, 512 So.2d 829 (Fla.1987). Davis argues that the trial court viola......
-
Spaziano v. State, 67929
...(Fla.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 995, 107 S.Ct. 598, 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986); Spaziano v. State, 545 So.2d 843 (Fla.1989); Spaziano v. Dugger, 557 So.2d 1372 (Fla.1990); Spaziano v. State, 570 So.2d 289 (Fla.1990); Spaziano v. Dugger, 584 So.2d 1 (Fla.1991).3 Spaziano v. Singletary, No. 91-850-......
-
Spaziano v. State
...deny all relief and vacate the stay previously entered. This is the sixth time that Spaziano has been before this Court. Spaziano v. Dugger, 557 So.2d 1372 (Fla.1990) (denied habeas corpus relief and relief in third rule 3.850 motion); Spaziano v. State, 545 So.2d 843 (Fla.1989) (denied rel......