Speigel v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
Decision Date | 25 January 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 75--1958,75--1958 |
Citation | 341 So.2d 832 |
Parties | Lawrence J. SPEIGEL, as personal representative of the Estates of Nereida Garcia, a minor, Deceased, on behalf of Carlos Garcia and Jesus Garcia and the Estates of Nereida Garcia and Ileana Garcia, Deceased, Appellants, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation authorized to do business in Florida, and Florida Power & Light Company, a Florida Corporation, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Adams, George, Lee & Schulte and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellants.
Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman and James D. Little, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, C.J., and BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a final summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants in an action wherein the defendants were charged with negligently maintaining a light and telephone pole so near the highway that plaintiffs' driver was fatally injured when her automobile collided with the pole.
In his summary final judgment, the trial judge set forth the following, in pertinent part:
After careful consideration of the record on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel we have concluded that the trial judge was correct in entering the judgment appealed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McMillan v. State Highway Com'n
... ... Speigel v Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co, 341 So 2d 832 ... ...
-
Brown v. U.S.
...to a plaintiff because an accident was not reasonably foreseeable, the Afarian court cited the following: Speigel v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 341 So.2d 832, 833 (Fla. Dist.Ct.App.1977) (affirming summary judgment for utility company, noting that a utility company has no obligation to guard ......
-
Florida Power and Light Co. v. Lively, 81-1571
...So.2d 542 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As implied, if not affirmatively appearing in this court's opinion in Speigel v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. and Florida Power & Light Co., supra, wherein no duty was found, it was possible that one of the many automobiles that passed a particular ......
-
Afarian v. Massachusetts Elec. Co.
...and speeding driver because such erratic and uncontrolled deviation not normal incident of travel); Speigel v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 341 So.2d 832, 833 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1977) (affirming summary judgment for utility company, noting utility company has no obligation to guard against ......