Spriggs v. Pioneer Carissa Gold Mines, Inc.

Decision Date18 April 1969
Docket NumberNo. 3735,3735
Citation453 P.2d 400
PartiesJohn J. SPRIGGS, Sr., Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. POINEER CARISSA GOLD MINES, INC., a Wyoming corporation, and George B. Colemere and Wyoming 75th Anniversary Commission, a Wyoming corporation, Appellees (Defendants below).
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

John J. Spriggs, Sr., pro se, Lander, for appellant.

G.L. Spence, Riverton, for appellees.

Before GRAY, C. J., and McINTYRE, PARKER, and McEWAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P., relating to disposition of fewer than all of the claims presented in an action when multiple claims or multiple parties are involved. Solution to the problem requires analysis of the pertinent portions of the record.

Plaintiff, John J. Spriggs, Sr., on August 3, 1967, commenced an action against the above-named defendants in the District Court of Fremont County, Wyoming, seeking as nearly as can be ascertained from an obfuscated complaint (a) to quiet title to certain mining claims situate in said county which have been the subject matter of much litigation in the courts of this state and in the Federal courts, (b) a possessory writ of some sort, and (c) damages against the defendants Pioneer Carissa Gold Mines, Inc., hereinafter called Pioneer, and George B. Colemere alleged to have resulted from the wrongful use and occupancy of the premises, destruction of property located thereon, and slander of title.

The defendant Wyoming 75th Anniversary Commission filed an answer in the nature of a disclaimer and denied allegations of the complaint not admitted by its disclaimer. Defendant George B. Colemere moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over his person. Pioneer in its separate response to the complaint moved that the complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, invoking the doctrine of res judicata. It also asserted a counterclaim for damages alleged to have resulted from malicious interference by plaintiff with the use and enjoyment of its property, slander of title, for malicious prosecution, and abuse of process. Application was also made for a citation of contempt against plaintiff for abuse of process and for an order restraining plaintiff 'from making any further claims or instituting any further proceedings involving, directly or indirectly, this defendant and the property involved herein' and any other actions having 'the effect of harassing, embarrassing, damaging or inconveniencing in any way this defendant with respect to the use and enjoyment of its said property as described in plaintiff's complaint.'

In response to Pioneer's counterclaim plaintiff moved to dismiss the same on the grounds that the counterclaim failed to state facts upon which relief could be granted. Plaintiff also moved for a citation of contempt against defendant for violation of an alleged injunction theretofore issued in dockets 4182 and 4623 of said court.

Other than the motion filed by Pioneer to dismiss plaintiff's complaint and plaintiff's motion to dismiss Pioneer's counterclaim, no question was raised concerning the pleadings, and thereafter the plaintiff and Pioneer entered into a stipulation whereby it was agreed that all of the preliminary matters above described would be submitted to the district court on written briefs with leave to supplement the record if the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in Big Horn River System, In re
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 30 Noviembre 1990
    ...v. McGuire, 537 P.2d 1128 (Wyo.1975), reh. granted in part 552 P.2d 1115 (1976), on reh. 562 P.2d 287 (1977); Spriggs v. Pioneer Carissa Gold Mines, Inc., 453 P.2d 400 (Wyo.1969); Wheatland Irrigation District v. Two Bar-Muleshoe Water Company, 431 P.2d 257 (Wyo.1967). This rule permits an ......
  • Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 6 Octubre 1975
    ...United Pacific Insurance Company v. Martin and Luther General Contractors, Inc., Wyo., 455 P.2d 664 (1969); Spriggs v. Pioneer Carissa Gold Mines, Inc., Wyo., 453 P.2d 400 (1969); Wheatland Irrigation District v. Two Bar-Muleshoe Water Company, Wyo., 431 P.2d 257 (1967); State ex rel. Pacif......
  • CIBC Nat'l Trust Co. v. Dominick
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 4 Mayo 2020
    ...there is a single claim for damages and the issue appealed is whether different forms of immunity apply); Spriggs v. Pioneer Carissa Gold Mines, Inc. , 453 P.2d 400 (Wyo. 1969) (stating that Rule 54(b) applied where the district court disposed of all plaintiff’s claims but did not decide th......
  • Tschirgi v. Meyer, s. 4413
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 5 Junio 1975
    ...of the claims. Whitehouse v. Stack, Wyo.1969, 458 P.2d 100; Ambariantz v. Cunningham, Wyo.1969, 460 P.2d 216; Spriggs v. Pioneer Carissa Gold Mines, Inc., Wyo.1969, 453 P.2d 400; Wheatland Irrigation District v. Two Bar-Muleshoe Water Company, Wyo.1969, 431 P.2d Defendant admits that the or......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT