Sprik v. Regents of University of Michigan, 6
Decision Date | 18 September 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 6,6 |
Citation | 390 Mich. 84,210 N.W.2d 332 |
Parties | Dale R. SPRIK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, a constitutional corporation, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Douvan, Harrington & Carpenter by Arthur E. Carpenter, Ann Arbor, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Roderick K. Daane, Ann Arbor, for defendant-appellee.
DeVine & DeVine, Allyn D. Kantor, Ann Arbor, for the Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor.
Before the Entire Bench (Except LEVIN, J.)
Plaintiffs are residents of apartment facilities owned and operated by defendant, Regents of the University of Michigan.
On March 1, 1971, plaintiffs instituted this class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, seeking an injunction against the defendant restraining it from collecting certain money from the plaintiffs and requiring the refund of such funds already collected.
The facts are not in dispute. In the Court of Claims where this action was originally heard, both defendant and plaintiffs sought summary judgment, each claiming that the pleaded and conceded facts entitled them to judgment.
The background of this controversy is well stated in a letter from the general counsel for the defendant to the Attorney General. The letter was attached to plaintiffs' complaint as an exhibit.
'The Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor has demanded that the University provide equitable compensation for the education furnished to children of students living in tax-exempt facilities either by a payment in lieu of taxation or by a payment for services rendered comparable to the contracts authorized by Mich.Stat.Ann. § 4.191, M.C.L.A. § 17.71.
'The Board of Regents has given conditional approval to this tentative agreement provided that a portion of the payment is obtained from an increase in rental of the housing facilities and provided, further, that no payment shall be made to the Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor until an opinion is obtained from the Attorney General of the State of Michigan or a court as to the legality of such payment.'
A second exhibit attached to plaintiffs' complaint is a notice to residents of University Apartment Facilities, including the present plaintiffs:
'As many of you are aware a rental increase for University Apartment Facilities was authorized at the May 15, 1970 meeting of the Board of Regents of the University. The new rents effective August 1, 1970 cover not only increases in costs of operations anticipated for next year but also include a sum of $6 per apartment per month as partial payment for school services available to children of University Family Housing residents.
'The Regents have stipulated that the rental increase attributable to school services will be collected as part of the rent effective August 1, 1970 but no payment will be made until an opinion is obtained from the Attorney General of the State of Michigan or a court of competent jurisdiction as to the legality of such payments for school services.
'Effective August 1, 1970 the following payments are due for your appropriate unit. These rental increases are being made in accord with the terms of your apartment lease agreement.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Littsey v. Board of Governors of Wayne State University
...238, 134 N.W.2d 146 (1965); Sprik v. Regents of the University of Michigan, 43 Mich.App. 178, 204 N.W.2d 62 (1972); aff'd 390 Mich. 84, 210 N.W.2d 332 (1973). M.C.L. § 600.6419(4); M.S.A. § 27A.6419(4) limits the jurisdiction of the Court of Claims as "(4) This chapter shall not be construe......
-
De Bruyn Produce Co. v. Romero, Docket No. 138771
...offered by the nondrafting party. Sprick v. Regents of Univ. of Mich., 43 Mich.App. 178, 186, 204 N.W.2d 62 (1972), aff'd 390 Mich. 84, 210 N.W.2d 332 (1973).5 Defendants acknowledge that, except for instances where their employment is illegally terminated, their right to possession ends wh......
-
Estate of Ritter by Ritter v. University of Michigan
...in Sprik v. Regents of the Univ. of Michigan, 43 Mich.App. 178, 184, 204 N.W.2d 62, 65 (1972) (citations omitted), aff'd 390 Mich. 84, 210 N.W.2d 332 (1973): "The Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over claims against the State. As the University of Michigan is a State institution, ......
-
William C. Reichenbach Co. v. State
...or public policy. Sprik v. Regents of University of Michigan, 43 Mich.App. 178, 204 N.W.2d 62 (1972), Aff'd on other grounds, 390 Mich. 84, 210 N.W.2d 332 (1973). On occasion, the appellate courts of this state have limited the power of constitutionally created university corporations. See ......