Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Co.
| Citation | 204 Ga.App. 245,419 S.E.2d 112 |
| Decision Date | 15 May 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. A92A0262,A92A0262 |
| Parties | SPRINGWELL DISPENSERS, INC. v. HALL CHINA COMPANY. |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Glass, McCullough, Sherrill & Harrold, R. Phillip Shinall III, James E. Dearing, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant.
Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, Charles T. Lester, Jr., Dulaney L. O'Roark III, Atlanta, for appellee.
Plaintiff Hall China Company filed suit against defendant SpringWell Dispensers, Inc., to collect an unpaid balance on a commercial account. Defendant answered and filed a counterclaim alleging it was damaged by plaintiff's breach of contract to supply defendant's demand for porcelain water dispensers manufactured by plaintiff to defendant's specifications. The trial court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissed the counterclaim. Defendant appeals the dismissal of its counterclaim.
We agree with defendant that the record contains evidence creating an issue of fact on its claim that plaintiff breached its agreement to supply defendant's demand for product. But the trial court did not err in dismissing the counterclaim because in answer to discovery requests the defendant indicated its only claim for damages was for lost profits and the only evidence of lost profits presented by defendant was too remote and speculative to sustain an award. Where, as here, the evidence shows the claimant was a new business with no history of profits and, in fact, was operating at a loss, the loss of prospective profits due to a breach of a supply contract is too remote and speculative to support a recovery of damages. See Radlo of Ga. v. Little, 129 Ga.App. 530(2), 199 S.E.2d 835 (1973). Despite the evidence of the profit defendant made per unit sold to its customers, no evidence was produced, as requested by the plaintiff, of orders or contracts which defendant was unable to fill due to plaintiff's alleged failure to ship the product to defendant. Despite the efforts of the defendant's expert witness to estimate lost sales and calculate the total profits lost, defendant "was not entitled to recover lost profits because it had no track record of profitability." Empire Shoe Co. v. NICO Indus., 197 Ga.App. 411, 414(2), 398 S.E.2d 440 (1990).
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
EZ Green Assocs., LLC v. Ga.-Pac. Corp.
...was required to show a “proven track record of profitability” to recover lost profits); Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Co., 204 Ga.App. 245, 246, 419 S.E.2d 112 (1992) (holding that new business with “no track record of profitability” was not entitled to recover lost profits as t......
-
Western Pub. Co., Inc. v. Mindgames, Inc.
...Limited Partnership v. Ameritech Pension Trust, 51 F.3d 1319, 1328 (7th Cir.1995) (Illinois law); Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Co., 204 Ga.App. 245, 419 S.E.2d 112 (1992) (Georgia law); Murray v. Hadid, 238 Va. 722, 385 S.E.2d 898, 905 (1989) (Virginia law). Arkansas, the state......
-
Burns Concrete, Inc. v. Teton Cnty.
...of lost profits too speculative where they were based on a one-month profit history); Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Co. , 204 Ga. App. 245, 245, 419 S.E.2d 112, 113 (1992) (lost profits too speculative where claimant "was a new business with no history of profits and, in fact, w......
-
Burns Concrete, Inc. v. Teton Cnty.
...projection of lost profits too speculative where they were based on a one-month profit history); Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Co., 204 Ga. App. 245, 245, 419 S.E.2d 112, 113 (1992) (lost profits too speculative where claimant "was a new business with no history of profits and, ......