St. Louis, C. G. & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. Wayne County

Decision Date04 December 1894
Citation125 Mo. 351,28 S.W. 494
CourtMissouri Supreme Court
PartiesST. LOUIS, C. G. & FT. S. RY. CO. v. WAYNE COUNTY.

Wayne county for damages for breach of contract. Judgment was rendered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

M. R. Smith, for appellant. M. M. Sheets, Dinning & Byrns, and John H. Raney, for respondent.

BURGESS, J.

This is an action upon a written contract entered into on March 14, 1882, by and between the Cape Girardeau Southwestern Railway Company, of the first part, and the county of Wayne, of the second part, the county at the time acting through the county court. The contract, leaving off the formal parts, reads as follows: "Whereas, the Cape Girardeau Southwestern Railway has this day bought all the remaining and unsold swamp and overflowed lands belonging to Wayne county, state of Missouri, for the price and sum of $1.25 per acre, the total amount of acres of yet unsold land being in the aggregate, as near as can be ascertained, 9,500 acres, and the aggregate price therefor $11,875; and whereas, the said county of Wayne has caused a patent or deed to be made and executed to said Cape Girardeau Southwestern Railway Company for said swamp and overflowed land, but which said patent or deed has been placed in the hands of James F. Hatton as an escrow, and is to be delivered to said railway company when it shall have paid for said land, as is in this contract hereafter fully and particularly set out; and whereas, said railway proposes to do certain work, to drain, reclaim and protect said land from the overflow of the St. Francois and Castor rivers, for the price and sum of $11,875, and which is a low charge for said work; and whereas, said proposed work will open up to settlement and cultivation a large portion of the southern part of this county, now practically of no value, and also promote the health of the county by a drainage of said lands: Now, therefore, in consideration of said premises, and other valuable considerations, this contract, entered into between the said county of Wayne, by order of its county court, duly entered of record, at the February special term, or adjourned term, and the Cape Girardeau Southwestern Railway Company, witnesseth that the said county of Wayne agrees to pay said railway company the sum of $11,875, said sum being the price of 9,500 acres of swamp land sold to said railway company at $1,25 an acre, and a deed or patent to which said lands has been made and executed by said county of Wayne this day, and delivered to James F. Hatton as an escrow, and to be by him delivered to said railway company when said railway company shall have fully performed and done the work hereinafter to be specified, and which said deed or patent shall be in full and complete payment for and on account of said work, without any other or further demand of payment for or in that behalf; and said railway company expressly covenants that it will not make any reclamation against said county for any defect or imperfection of title hereby conveyed, or any part thereof. And said Cape Girardeau Southwestern Railway Company contracts, agrees, and undertakes, in consideration of said sum of $11,875, so to be paid as aforesaid set out: 1st. To erect, build, and maintain...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Simpson v. Stoddard County
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1903
    ...to the case at bar is for the same reason applicable to the Sullivan County Case. The case of St. Louis, Cape Girardeau & Ft. Smith Railway Company v. Wayne Co., 125 Mo. 351, 28 S. W. 494, was a suit upon a contract entered into by the county with the railroad company relative to certain wo......
  • The State in Behalf of and to Use of Public Schools of Stoddard County v. Crumb
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1900
    ...v. Robbins, 51 Mo. 82; Sturgeon v. Hampton, 88 Mo. 211; Railroad v. Hatton, 102 Mo. 55; Dunklin Co. v. Chouteau, 120 Mo. 594; Railroad v. Wayne Co., 125 Mo. 356. C. Keaton and Martin L. Clardy for respondents. (1) The attorneys prosecuting this action have no authority to institute or prose......
  • Sugg v. Wisconsin Lumber Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • June 15, 1922
    ...are bound to take notice of their powers and authority.' Sturgeon v. Hampton, 88 Mo. 203; Railroad v. Hatton, 102 Mo. 45; Railroad v. Wayne County, 125 Mo. 351.' case of Wheeler v. Land Co., supra, was upon the facts, making for alleged invalidity of a patent involved therein, almost on all......
  • Moss v. Kauffman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1895
    ... ... D ... Potter for appellants ...          (1) The ... deed from the county of Bollinger to Mr. Allen and the ... payment by Mr. Allen of the railroad stock to the county all ... Railroad v. Hatten, 102 Mo. 55; Saline County v ... Wilson, 61 Mo. 237; Railroad v. Wayne County, ... 125 Mo. 357; Session Acts, 1868, p. 69, sec. 3; Session Acts, ... 1869, p. 67, sec ... Plaintiffs' claim title under a ... deed from Bollinger county to William Brown and Louis Houck ... dated May 13, 1887; and by deed from Brown and Houck to J. T ... Moss, deceased, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT