Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Willock
Decision Date | 03 October 1894 |
Citation | 29 S.W. 218 |
Parties | STANDARD FIRE INS. CO. OF KANSAS CITY v. WILLOCK. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Action by J. M. Willock against the Standard Fire Insurance Company, of Kansas City, Mo. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Leake, Sheppard & Miller and K. R. Craig, for appellant. Throckmorton & Garnett, for appellee.
Conclusions of Fact.
The conclusions of fact of the court below are found to be correct, and are adopted as the conclusions of this court.
Conclusions of Law.
The clause in the policy, known as the "Iron-safe clause," is a warranty, binding on appellee, and a failure to have complied with it would have defeated appellee's claim. Kelley-Goodfellow Shoe Co. v. Liberty Ins. Co. (decided by this court Sept. 26, 1894) 28 S. W. 1027. The effect of the findings of the court below was that appellee had complied with the provisions of the clause, and the effect of all the assignments of error is an attack upon such finding. While we might have reached a different conclusion from that reached by the trial court, had we tried the case originally, yet there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict; and under the well-established rule of law, as enunciated by our supreme court in many cases, that a judgment of a lower court, when attacked for want of sufficient evidence, will not be reversed, where there is testimony to support it, we do not feel authorized to disturb it. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Additional Conclusions of Fact.
(Nov. 14, 1894.)
At the request of plaintiff in error, we find the following additional conclusions of fact. The following statement, taken from brief of plaintiff in error, shows the testimony of plaintiff below as to, and his exemplification of, his system of bookkeeping, and the manner in which a record of his business was kept, which statement we find to be correct, to wit:
Plaintiff testified on cross-examination: Witness here made samples of entries made in his cash and merchandise book, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex inf. Mallett ex rel. Womack v. City of Joplin
... ... 168, 200 S.W. 101; State ex inf. v. Standard Oil Co., 218 Mo ... 345, 116 S.W. 902. (2) While the exercise of ... [332 ... Mo. 1200] "There are no fire hydrants and no fire ... protection. The Joplin fire department is called ... ...
-
State ex Inf. Mallett v. Joplin
... ... v. Peoples Ice Co., 246 Mo. 168, 200 S.W. 101; State ex inf. v. Standard Oil Co., 218 Mo. 345, 116 S.W. 902. (2) While the exercise of delegated ... "There are no fire hydrants and no fire protection. The Joplin fire department is called in ... ...
-
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Johnson
... ... What is ... commonly known as the "iron-safe clause" in a ... policy of fire insurance, requiring the insured to "keep ... a set of books which shall clearly and plainly ... manner, from the nature and objects of the parties." In ... Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Willock (Tex. Civ. App.) ... 29 S.W. 218, it was said that there was "a ... ...
-
Security Nat. Fire Ins. Co. v. Schott Drug Co.
...of the insured to itemize the goods added to its stock is no breach of the iron-safe warranty clause. Also see Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Willock (Tex. Civ.App.) 29 S.W. 218, 219, where insured's record of purchases was shown by entries in merchandise account similar to those of appellee, an......