Stang v. Meade School Dist. 46-1, No. 18430
Court | Supreme Court of South Dakota |
Writing for the Court | McMURCHIE; MILLER; McMURCHIE, Circuit Judge, for HENDERSON; KONENKAMP |
Citation | 526 N.W.2d 496 |
Parties | Connie K. STANG, Claimant and Appellee, v. MEADE SCHOOL DISTRICT 46-1, Employer and Appellant, and American States Insurance, Insurer and Appellant. . Considered on Briefs |
Decision Date | 25 April 1994 |
Docket Number | No. 18430 |
Page 496
v.
MEADE SCHOOL DISTRICT
46-1, Employer and Appellant,
and
American States Insurance, Insurer and Appellant.
Decided Jan. 11, 1995.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 16, 1995.
James D. Leach, Viken, Viken, Pechota, Leach & Dewell, Rapid City, for appellee.
David M. Dillon, of Costello, Porter, Hill, Heisterkamp & Bushnell, Rapid City, for appellants.
McMURCHIE, Circuit Judge.
Meade School District 46-1 (Employer) and American States Insurance (Insurer) appeal a circuit court judgment in a worker's compensation case. Judge Steven L. Zinter affirmed the Division of Labor and Management's (Division) decision to classify the claimant, Connie Stang (Stang), within the odd-lot category. We affirm.
WAS THE DEPARTMENT'S DECISION GRANTING STANG PERMANENT TOTAL DISABILITY BENEFITS UNDER THE ODD-LOT DOCTRINE CLEARLY ERRONEOUS IN LIGHT OF THE ENTIRE EVIDENCE?
On March 14, 1989, Stang, while employed as a custodian by Employer, attempted to
Page 497
unclog the chute on a snow blower without turning it off. Her left hand was badly injured with multiple fractures and significant soft tissue damage, resulting in three operations.Stang was taken to Sturgis Hospital, then transferred by ambulance to Rapid City Regional Hospital. During the course of Stang's treatment, Michael D. Brandner, M.D., a hand surgeon, performed three separate surgeries as Stang's treating physician.
On June 17, 1991, Dr. Brandner determined that Stang had reached maximal recovery. Dr. Brandner's assessment of Stang's injury included notations that Stang had diminished grip strength, pinch strength, length of the index finger, range of motion involving the left wrist and all fingers of the left hand. Additionally, he found she had diminished sensibility involving the ulnar aspect of the left index finger. Dr. Brandner also noted subjective factors, including diminished strength, dexterity and cold tolerance. Dr. Brandner opined that Stang had a permanent partial disability rating of her left hand of 35%, which was equivalent to approximately "a 32% permanent partial disability for the left upper extremity as a whole."
Stang wears a glove on her left hand to keep it warm in mild weather and a battery heated glove during cold weather. She cannot close her left hand to make a fist because of stiffness and pain. Stang wears prescribed plastic finger splints on her middle and index fingers at all times. She has difficulty with household duties, driving, and dressing because of the injury to her left hand. Stang experiences increased pain which extends up her wrist and into her arm when she overuses her left hand. It is conceded that Stang's overuse, repetitive action and therapy will not increase the strength and dexterity of her hand, indicating maximal recovery.
Stang's employment history includes work as a motel maid, as a cleaning woman in private homes, and as a waitress. Stang worked as a custodian from 1977 until she was injured on the job in 1989. She completed the eighth grade and later received her General Education Diploma. Stang is 49 years old. She is the mother of three grown children.
There is no dispute that Stang's injury prevents her from returning to her previous employment as a custodian. Stang completed a Functional Capacity Assessment (FCA) which indicated that she could perform periodic dexterity tasks, such as typing. Dr. Brandner and Dr. Anderson did not object to periodic typing tasks. However, Dr. Goff believed all repetitive hand actions should be eliminated and stated that it was unrealistic "to expect [that] she can do things like assemble, type, keypunch."
Diane Christiansen (Christiansen), a nurse rehabilitation specialist retained by the Insurer, enrolled Stang in the clerical skills program at the Career Learning Center in Rapid City. Christiansen sought and obtained Dr. Brandner's approval of the training program. Stang enjoyed attending the Career Learning Center four hours each day, working on various clerical assignments. She successfully completed a formal program at the Career Learning Center in mid-October 1991.
Shortly after beginning the clerical skills course, Stang began a job search. She worked as a temporary clerical worker at an alcohol and drug curriculum program for approximately thirty days between November and December 1991 while still enrolled in the clerical curriculum at the Career Learning Center. With assistance from Christiansen, Stang began a job search in July 1992 and intensified her search upon completion of the clerical course work in October 1992. Stang kept a detailed diary of her efforts to find work. After over 100 applications Stang's search for permanent work was unsuccessful. Stang also registered with Job Service and met with a representative on a regular basis.
Mr. Richard Ostrander, a vocational rehabilitation specialist and licensed professional counselor, testified by deposition concerning Stang's performance on the GATB exam: "She is way below...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sanford v. Sanford, No. 23175
...law under the de novo standard. Therkildsen v. Fisher Beverage, 1996 SD 39, ¶ 8, 545 N.W.2d 834, 836 (citing Stang v. Meade Sch. Dist., 526 N.W.2d 496, 498 [¶ 13.] Statutory construction is used to discover the true intent of the legislature in enacting laws, which is ascertained primarily ......
-
Therkildsen v. Fisher Beverage, No. 19176
...de novo. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co., 489 N.W.2d 353, 357 (S.D.1992). We review questions of law de novo. Stang v. Meade Sch. Dist., 526 N.W.2d 496, 498 ANALYSIS AND DECISION ¶9 1. Whether the Department of Labor and the Circuit Court erred in finding that intoxication was a substantial ......
-
Eite v. Rapid City Area School Dist. 51-4, No. 24178.
...`the community where the claimant is already residing' for persons with all of claimant's limitations." Stang v. Meade School Dist. 46-1, 526 N.W.2d 496, 499 (S.D.1995) (quoting Shepherd v. Moorman Mfg., 467 NW2d 916, 920 (S.D.1991) (emphasis in [¶ 27.] Based on Rogers' testimony, the Depar......
-
Sanford v. Sanford, No. 23175
...law under the de novo standard. Therkildsen v. Fisher Beverage, 1996 SD 39, ¶ 8, 545 N.W.2d 834, 836 (citing Stang v. Meade Sch. Dist., 526 N.W.2d 496, 498 [¶ 13.] Statutory construction is used to discover the true intent of the legislature in enacting laws, which is ascertained primarily ......
-
Therkildsen v. Fisher Beverage, No. 19176
...de novo. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co., 489 N.W.2d 353, 357 (S.D.1992). We review questions of law de novo. Stang v. Meade Sch. Dist., 526 N.W.2d 496, 498 ANALYSIS AND DECISION ¶9 1. Whether the Department of Labor and the Circuit Court erred in finding that intoxication was a substantial ......
-
Eite v. Rapid City Area School Dist. 51-4, No. 24178.
...`the community where the claimant is already residing' for persons with all of claimant's limitations." Stang v. Meade School Dist. 46-1, 526 N.W.2d 496, 499 (S.D.1995) (quoting Shepherd v. Moorman Mfg., 467 NW2d 916, 920 (S.D.1991) (emphasis in [¶ 27.] Based on Rogers' testimony, the Depar......