Starr v. Smith

Decision Date04 February 1955
Citation77 So.2d 834
PartiesDave STARR, as Sheriff of Orange County, Florida, Appellant, v. Matthew SMITH, Appellee.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Bart L. Cohen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Sam E. Murrell, Sam E. Murrell, Jr., and Robert G. Murrell, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the appellee was not actually in custody at the time the writ of habeas corpus was awarded, and that the appellee was discharged the day the writ issued and one week before the sheriff's return was filed, the order of discharge is reversed with directions to quash the writ. Sullivan v. State ex rel. McCrory, Fla., 49 So.2d 794.

Reversed.

MATHEWS, C. J., and TERRELL, THOMAS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Kolski v. Watkins, 75-3013
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • January 3, 1977
    ...on the ground that, for the purposes of state habeas corpus relief, Petitioner was not in the custody of the City, citing Starr v. Smith, Fla., 1955, 77 So.2d 834. The question of the constitutionality of the statute was not reached by the State Appellate Court. Petitioner's petition for re......
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • January 16, 1957
    ...Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee. PEARSON, Associate Justice. This is the second appearance of this case before this Court. See, Starr v. Smith, Fla., 77 So.2d 834. In the earlier case the Appeal was by the State from a Writ of Habeas Corpus wherein the Circuit Court held that the informatio......
  • Lambertson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 7, 1985
    ...not in custody and is avoiding arrest. A petitioner who is not in custody is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus. Starr v. Smith, 77 So.2d 834 (Fla.1955). Relying on Sellers v. Bridges, 153 Fla. 586, 15 So.2d 293 (1943) and Ex Parte Bosso, 41 So.2d 322 (Fla.1949), petitioner argues that......
  • Sandstrom v. Kolski, 74--493
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 22, 1974
    ...and, therefore, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the subject petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Starr v. Smith, Fla.1955, 77 So.2d 834. Accordingly, the order sustaining the petition for writ of habeas corpus hereby is quashed. Is is so ordered. NATHAN, Judge (specially......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT