State Bd. of Ins. v. Westland Film Industries

Decision Date05 March 1986
Docket NumberNo. C-4773,C-4773
Citation705 S.W.2d 695
PartiesThe STATE BOARD OF INSURANCE of the State of Texas, et al, Petitioners, v. WESTLAND FILM INDUSTRIES, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., Allene D. Evans, David C. Duggins, Clark, Thomas, Winters & Newton, Austin, for petitioners.

John F. Morehead, Daugherty, Kuperman, Golden & Morehead, J. Stephen Ravel, Daugherty, Kuperman, Golden & Morehead, Austin, David V. Herin, Coover & Coover, Corpus Christi, Mary A. Keeney, Daugherty, Kuperman, Golden & Morehead, Austin, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Westland Film Industries sued the Texas Catastrophe Property Insurance Association and the State Board of Insurance in the Travis County District Court seeking review of a final order of the State Board of Insurance dismissing Westland's administrative proceeding against TCPIA as untimely. The trial court rendered summary judgment that Westland take nothing, thereby affirming the State Board of Insurance's decision. On appeal, the court of appeals reversed and remanded the cause to the trial court. 697 S.W.2d 621. We grant the applications for writ of error, and, pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 483, without hearing oral argument, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand this cause to that court for review of the points of error submitted by Westland in its brief filed therein.

The only issue presented by the motion for summary judgment and response was the propriety of the State Board of Insurance's action in dismissing Westland's proceeding as untimely. The trial court found that the State Board of Insurance's order was correct as a matter of law and, accordingly, rendered summary judgment that Westland take nothing. The court of appeals reversed the summary judgment on grounds neither raised in the trial court in opposition to the TCPIA's and the State Board of Insurance's summary judgment motion, nor presented to the court of appeals.

An appellate court is not authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of properly assigned error. Gulf Consolidated International, Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex.1983). Moreover, issues not expressly presented to the trial court may not be considered on appeal as grounds for reversal of a summary judgment. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Authority, 589 S.W.2d 671, 675 (Tex.1979). See also Tex.R.Civ.P. 166-A(c).

The court of appeals reversed the summary judgment on grounds not properly before it. Furthermor...

To continue reading

Request your trial
73 cases
  • Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, 16–0328
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • June 29, 2018
    ...is not authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of properly assigned error."); State Bd. of Ins. v. Westland Film Indus. , 705 S.W.2d 695, 696 (Tex. 1986) (per curiam) ("An appellate court is not authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of properly ......
  • Swinehart v Stubbeman & McRae
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 7, 2001
    ...A summary judgment may not be reversed on a ground not raised in the trial court. Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(c); State Bd. of Ins. v. Westland Film Indus., 705 S.W.2d 695, 696 (Tex. 1986); City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin Auth., 589 S.W.2d 671, 676 (Tex. 1979). Therefore, Swinehart has waived......
  • Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Rincones
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • May 26, 2017
    ...was not presented to the trial court, it may not be considered on appeal to revive his claim here. State Bd. of Ins. v. Westland Film Indus. , 705 S.W.2d 695, 696 (Tex. 1986) (per curiam) ("[I]ssues not expressly presented to the trial court may not be considered on appeal as grounds for re......
  • Alm v. Aluminum Co. of America
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • July 2, 1986
    ...is not authorized to reverse a lower court's judgment in the absence of properly assigned error. See State Bd. of Ins. of State of Texas v. Westland Film Indus., 705 S.W.2d 695 (Tex.1986); Gulf Consolidated Int'l. Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565 (Tex.1983). The above rationale was applied in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT