State ex Inf. Latham ex rel. Dawes v. Allen

Decision Date12 March 1951
Docket NumberNo. 42024,No. 2,42024,2
Citation237 S.W.2d 489,361 Mo. 963
PartiesSTATE ex inf. LATHAM ex rel. DAWES et al v. ALLEN et al
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

J. W. Roberts, Savannah, for appellants.

John J. Robison, Harold Miller, Maysville, for respondents.

BARRETT, Commissioner.

This is a proceeding in quo warranto at the relation of resident taxpayers and patrons of Blue School District No. 25 and Liberty School District No. 47 of Andrew County against the officers and directors of the newly 'Enlarged School District R-II, DeKalb County, Missouri.' It is a companion case to Spiking School District No. 71, DeKalb County, Missouri v. The Purported 'Enlarged School District R-II, DeKalb County, Missouri,' Mo.Sup., 245 S.W.2d 13, and the purpose of the proceeding here, as it is in that case, is to test the validity of the consolidation, and in particular the validity of the special election at which consolidation was effectuated. The attack in this case is from the point of view of the interested residents of Andrew County, while the attack in that case is from the viewpoint of certain affected residents of DeKalb County. The cause was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed statement of facts and the limited question presented is the validity and sufficiency of the notice calling the special election. The notice was published in the following newspapers in DeKalb County: Union Star Times, Stewartsville News, DeKalb County Record Journal and the DeKalb County Herald and the precise question for decision is whether, under the statute, Mo.R.S.1949, Sec. 165.680, the notice must also have been published in the one newspaper of general circulation in Andrew County, the Savannah Reporter and Andrew County Democrat.

The greater part of Enlarged School District R-II, as to area, the number of former common school districts included and population, is in DeKalb County. The exact number of former districts included does not appear but it is many times the four former common school districts included from Andrew County. The printed notices were also posted in at least three public places in each affected district. There was a total of 875 eligible and qualified voters in the entire territory affected, 247 of whom lived in Andrew County and of that number 155 actually voted and participated in the election. The Savannah Reporter and Andrew County Democrat had 2,945 subscribers, 1904 of whom lived in Andrew County with fifty-one subscribers among the qualified voters in the territory affected. The Union Star Times had fourty-nine subscribers among the qualified voters in the affected territory in Andrew County.

After the county board of education has made a survey and prepared detailed plans for the reorganization of school districts and the plans have been approved, Mo.R.S.1949, Secs. 165.673, 165.677, the secretary of the county board of education 'shall call an election in each proposed enlarged school district that lies wholly within the county or has been designated by the state board of education as belonging to the county. The notices of such election shall be by written or printed notices, signed by the president and secretary of the county board of education. Such notices shall be posted in at least three public places within each school district affected by the proposal and shall also be published at least two times in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the county or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • American Legion Phillips Post v. City of Malden
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 25 Noviembre 1959
    ...Bird, 295 Mo. 344, 244 S.W. 938; State ex rel. Board of Fund Commissioners v. Holman, Mo., 296 S.W.2d 482; State ex inf. Latham ex rel. Dawes v. Allen, 361 Mo. 963, 237 S.W.2d 489; see 18 Am.Jur., Elections, sec. 110, p. 248. This is on the theory that the people, once having freely spoken ......
  • Spiking School Dist. No. 71, DeKalb County v. Purported 'Enlarged School Dist. R-11, DeKalb County, Mo.'
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 14 Enero 1952
    ...Dist. No. 9 of New Madrid County v. Thompson, 325 Mo. 1170, 30 S.W.2d 603. The case of State ex inf. of Latham, Prosecuting Attorney v. Allen, 361 Mo. 963, 237 S.W.2d 489, was submitted in Division Two of this court at the same session as the case at bar, and in that case we held that the p......
  • State ex inf. Stipp ex rel. Stokes Mound School Dist. No. 7 v. Colliver
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 12 Noviembre 1951
    ...rely upon the following cases. State ex rel. City of Berkeley v. Holmes, 358 Mo. 1237, 219 S.W.2d 650; State ex inf. Latham ex rel. Dawes v. Allen, 361 Mo. 963, 237 S.W.2d 489, 490; State ex inf. Burges ex rel. Marbut v. Potter, Mo.Sup., 191 S.W. 57, 59; Wood v. City of St. Joseph, 238 Mo.A......
  • Adoption of Sypolt, In re
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 12 Marzo 1951
    ... ... , Director for Franklin County of the State Division of Welfare, and R. H. Schaper, ... State ex rel. Jacobsmeyer v. Thatcher, 338 Mo. 622, 92 S.W.2d ... 456, 147 S.W.2d 667; State ex inf. Rice v. Hawk, Mo.Sup., 228 S.W.2d 785, 789 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT