State ex rel. Adler v. Court of Common Pleas of Wood County, 79-679

Decision Date02 January 1980
Docket NumberNo. 79-679,79-679
Citation398 N.E.2d 787,61 Ohio St.2d 1
Parties, 15 O.O.3d 1 The STATE ex rel. ADLER, Appellee, v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF WOOD COUNTY, Appellant.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Relator, Larry F. Adler, was charged with kidnapping (R.C. 2905.01) and felonious assault (R.C. 2903.11). A preliminary hearing was held in the Perrysburg Municipal Court on the assault charge, and Adler was bound over to the grand jury. Before the court considered the kidnapping charge against Adler, however, the police prosecutor 1 told Adler and his counsel that the charge of kidnapping would be dismissed if Adler would "execute a release." 2 The release was signed, and the kidnapping charge was dismissed.

Following a discussion between the police prosecutor and representatives of the Wood County Prosecuting Attorney's office, the prosecuting attorney presented evidence arising from facts in the dismissed kidnapping charge to the grand jury which returned an indictment charging Adler with abduction (R.C. 2905.02), a lesser included offense of kidnapping.

Adler pleaded not guilty in the Court of Common Pleas of Wood County and moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the police prosecutor had agreed not to prosecute him on the charge of kidnapping in exchange for his release of any claim against Perrysburg officials. Adler's motion for dismissal was denied.

Adler then instituted the instant action in prohibition in the Court of Appeals seeking to prohibit the Court of Common Pleas of Wood County from proceeding on the indictment for the crime of abduction.

The Court of Appeals allowed the writ.

An appeal as of right brings the cause to this court for review.

John J. Callahan, Toledo, for appellee.

John S. Cheetwood, Pros. Atty., for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The issue before this court is, simply, whether a writ of prohibition should issue in this cause to prevent respondent court from proceeding with the matter before it.

A writ of prohibition will not issue against a court unless it is about to exercise judicial power and "the exercise of such power must amount to an unauthorized usurpation of judicial power." State, ex rel. Zakany, v. Avellone (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 25, 26, 387 N.E.2d 1373, 1374.

In the cause before us, the Court of Common Pleas had original jurisdiction in the action relator seeks to prohibit. The action of respondent in denying relator's motion to dismiss the indictment, even assuming, Arguendo, that it may be erroneous, does not constitute the unauthorized usurpation of judicial power. Prohibition will not lie to prevent enforcement of an allegedly erroneous judgment rendered by a court with jurisdiction. State, ex rel. Mansfield Telephone Co., v. Mayer (1966), 5 Ohio St.2d 222, 223, 215 N.E.2d 375; Marsh v....

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State, ex rel. Smith v. Court of Common Pleas, Probate Div.
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 23 Giugno 1982
    ...disability, or to such persons for four months after such disability is removed."3 This court's holdings in State, ex rel. Adler, v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 1, 3, 398 N.E.2d 787; and DuBose v. Court, supra, 64 Ohio St.2d at page 171, 413 N.E.2d 1205, were predicated on the following lan......
  • State of Ohio, ex rel William J. Novak v. Judge Patrick Carroll, Case
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 2 Settembre 1999
    ... ... 75098.99-LW-3773 (8th)Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, ... and administrative judge of the court of common pleas ... transferred Case No. 95 CRB 19316 ... the name of any city, state, county or a date of issuance ... (pursuant to the ... 97 B 1347. See State ex rel. Adler v. Court ... (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 1, 398 ... ...
  • DuBose v. Court of Common Pleas of Trumbull County, 80-1091
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 23 Dicembre 1980
    ...Court of Common Pleas with original jurisdiction of the crime of aggravated murder. As we recently ruled in State ex rel. Adler v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 1, 3, 398 N.E.2d 787: "The action of respondent in denying relator's motion to dismiss the indictment, even assuming, arguendo, that......
  • State ex rel. Shoop v. Mitrovich, 82-463
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 11 Maggio 1983
    ...court of common pleas. State, ex rel. Gilla, v. Fellerhoff (1975), 44 Ohio St.2d 86, 88, 338 N.E.2d 522 ; State, ex rel. Adler, v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 1, 2, 398 N.E.2d 787 . Relator has a plain and adequate remedy at law by way of appeal from any adverse judgment against The judgmen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT