State ex rel. Budd v. Williams

Decision Date19 January 1943
Citation152 Fla. 189,11 So.2d 341
PartiesSTATE ex rel. BUDD et ux. v. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, et al.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Robert C. Lane, of Miami, for relators.

Bouvier, Goldberg & Haskins, of Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on demurrer to petition for prohibition on which rule nisi heretofore issued.

It is admitted by demurrer that respondent Circuit Judge entered an order purporting to correct a final decree which had theretofore been affirmed by this court. See Budd et al. v. Gooch, Fla., 9 So.2d 633.

When the decree of the circuit court was affirmed by this court, such decree was merged and became the judgment and decree of this court. Bloxham v. Florida Cent., etc., R. Co., 39 Fla. 243, 22 So. 697; Palm Beach Estates v. Croker, 106 Fla. 617, 143 So. 792, 794. After affirmance of the decree by this court the circuit court was without jurisdiction to alter or change the decree as so affirmed without first having authority from this court to so act.

The demurrer is overruled and answer filed is held to be insufficient. Prohibition absolute will be awarded, without prejudice, however, to the filing of petition in this court for leave to the circuit court to consider and act upon petition to amend the final decree so as to make it conform to the record and a just determination of the rights of the parties.

So ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., and TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., not participating.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State ex rel. Tobin v. Holt, 59-662
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 Enero 1960
    ...122, 163 So. 519; State ex rel. Gibbs v. Circuit Court of Eleventh Judicial Circuit, 140 Fla. 378, 191 So. 699; State ex rel. Budd v. Williams, 152 Fla. 189, 11 So.2d 341; Eisenburg v. Cornblum, 156 Fla. 702, 24 So.2d 236; Berger v. Leposky, Fla.1958, 103 So.2d 628, As early as 1897 in the ......
  • Wood v. Manatee Bay Corp., 79-2072
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 6 Agosto 1980
    ...case. The effect of that affirmance was that thereafter the trial court was powerless to amend or change the judgment. Budd v. Williams, 152 Fla. 189, 11 So.2d 341 (1943). The lower court had no power to amend its final judgment, now affirmed by this court, and grant some new, different or ......
  • Milton v. Keith
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 24 Febrero 1987
    ...court, when affirmed by an appellate court, becomes the order, judgment or decree of the appellate court. State ex rel. Budd v. Williams, 152 Fla. 189, 11 So.2d 341 (Fla.1943) (where circuit court decree was affirmed by the supreme court, circuit court was without jurisdiction to alter the ......
  • Eisenburg v. Cornblum
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 18 Diciembre 1945
    ... ... See Baskin v. Klemm, ... 118 Fla. 657, 160 So. 509; State ex rel. Budd v ... Williams, 152 Fla. 189, 11 So.2d 341; Wymay v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT