State ex rel. Cosmopolis Consol. School Dist. No. 99, Grays Harbor County v. Bruno
Decision Date | 14 February 1963 |
Docket Number | No. 36753,36753 |
Citation | 378 P.2d 691,61 Wn.2d 461 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | The STATE of Washington, on the Relation of COSMOPOLIS CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 99, GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY, Washington, Appellant, v. Louis BRUNO, as Superintendent of Public Instruction, State of Washington, and President of the State Board of Education, State of Washington et al., Respondents. |
Manley & Kirkwood, Aberdeen, for appellant.
John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen., Bruce Cohoe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, L. Edward Brown, Pros. Atty., Grays Harbor County, Aberdeen, for respondents.
This certiorari proceeding was previously before us upon a jurisdictional issue. State ex rel. Cosmopolis Consolidated School Dist. No. 99, etc., v. Bruno, 59 Wash.2d 366, 367 P.2d 995 (1962). The cause was remanded to the court for a trial on the merits of whether the Grays Harbor County Committee on School District Organization and the State Board of Education, in fixing the contribution of Cosmopolis Consolidated School District No. 99 to the Aberdeen high school building program at $329,865, acted arbitrarily and capriciously, and contrary to law. The court found that the defendants has fixed the amount of the contribution according to law, denied the writ, and dismissed the cause with prejudice.
From the judgment of dismissal, Cosmopolis Consolidated School District No. 99 has appealed.
For convenience, the Grays Harbor County Committee on School District Organization with hereinafter be referred to as the county committee, the State Board of Education as the state board, Aberdeen School District No. 5 as Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis Consolidated School District No. 99 as Cosmopolis.
The facts which gave rise to this review are as follows:
The appellant, Cosmopolis, is a nonhigh school district, and Aberdeen is a high school district. Cosmopolis has sent its high school students to Aberdeen for many years.
Pursuant to RCW 28.56.010, Aberdeen submitted to the county committee a request to prepare a plan for submission to the state board, providing for adequate and satisfactory participation by Aberdeen and Cosmopolis in the payment of the $1,289,544 necessary for the construction of additional high school facilities. In compliance with the request, the county committee, after notice and hearing, submitted the following proposal for the consideration of the state board:
'Grays Harbor County--Aberdeen School District No. 5
'A proposal for the financing of high school facilities in the Aberdeen School District No. 5, Grays Harbor County, Washington, by the following school districts of Grays Harbor County:
School District Amount to Name No. Be Provided a ------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- Aberdeen 5 (high school district) $1,079,544.00 Cosmopolis 99 (nonhigh school district) 210 000.00 ---------------------------- $1,289,544.00
Note *a It is understood that districts eligible for State aid will be given
full advantage of same.
The state board rejected the plan, stating:
'The foregoing proposal was not approved by the State Board of Education for the following reason:
'The plan submitted for meeting the cost of high school facilities in the Aberdeen School District did not include a sufficient amount to be contributed by the Cosmopolis School District.
'It is suggested that another plan be submitted which is in conformity with principles and policies heretofore followed by the State Board of Education in considering a proposal for participation by non-high school districts in financing school facilities located in a high school district.' (Italics ours.)
The state board suggested a revised plan which increased the contribution of Cosmopolis. The county committee met April 25, 1961, to consider the proposal submitted by the state board. The minutes of the secretary to the county committee state:
'In response to a question, Mr. Pence said that the State Board was insistent that the districts concerned participate on the basis of ratio of valuations. He then presented revised figures to the Committee which placed the Cosmopolis obligation at 25.58% and Aberdeen at 74.42% of the total, or $329,865.00 for the Cosmopolis share and $959,679.00 for the Aberdeen contribution. No member of the Committee had previously had any knowledge of these figures.
'Discussion followed in which extreme dissatisfaction with state policy and method was expressed, and question raised as to the function of the local committee.
'Mr. Spoon moved that a public hearing be held to consider a plan that 'is in conformity with principles and policies heretofore followed by the State Board of Education in considering a proposal for participation by non high districts in financing school facilities located in a high school district, predicated upon the assessed valuation of the two districts, one to the other, using current figures furnished by the County Superintendent of Schools.' Motion seconded by Mrs. Vavrek. Carried.
The secretary's minutes of the May 9, 1961, meeting are in part as follows:
The county committee then went into executive session, and the minutes disclose that the following transpired:
The secretary's minutes of the meeting on May 17, 1961, are in part as follows:
'After calling the meeting to order, Mr. Kellogg said that it was the consensus of opinion that no action had been taken on the proposition for which the hearing of May 9 had been held; therefore the purpose of his meeting (May 17) was to complete the work of the May 9 hearing at Cosmopolis and dispose of the question on which the hearing was held.
* * *
In conformity with the motion, the following letter was written:
'1. The Grays Harbor County Committee on School District Reorganization this date has taken the only action possible under the 'principles and policies of the State Board respecting participating financial proposals' in the Aberdeen-Cosmopolis high school building program.
'2. This Committee submitted a previous plan which was rejected and was in effect told that the only plan acceptable to the State Board was one that 'met with the principles and policies' of the State Board.
'3. The Committee is submitting this attached plan only because we do not desire to hold up the Aberdeen building program.
'4. Aberdeen merits greater entitlement from State funds than the 8.1 per cent provided by this proposal. Therefore, the Committee strongly urges allocation to this district the full twenty per cent of the project cost.
'GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY COMMITTEE ON SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANIZATION
'Signed: Harold B. Kellogg, Chairman
Donald O. Spoon
Charles Hay
Asa Fishel
Mary C. Wroth
Ilah M. Vavrek
Kenneth Day'
The state board met on June 9, 1961, and the minutes disclose, inter alia:
'MEETING OF JUNE 9, 1961
'Grays Harbor County--Aberdeen School District No. 5
'A proposal for the financing of high school facilities in Aberdeen School District No. 5, Grays Harbor County, by the following school districts in Grays Harbor County:
School District Amount to Name No. B3 Provideda ---------------------------------- ------------------------ Aberdeen 5 Cosmopolis 99 (nonhigh school 329,865.00 district) ------------------------ $1,289,544.00
Note *a It is understood that districts eligible for State aid will be given full
advantage of same.
* * *
* * *
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Leschi Imp. Council v. Washington State Highway Commission
... ... plans a limited access facility through a county or an incorporated city or town, it shall give ... State ex rel. Northeast Transp. Co. v. Abel, 10 Wash.2d 349, ... School Dist. No. 7 v. Bruno, 62 Wash.2d 790, 384 P.2d ... Cosmopolis Consol. School Dist. No. 99 v. Bruno, 59 Wash.2d ... ...
-
California Assn. of Nursing Homes etc., Inc. v. Williams
... ... the standards which determine the level of state payments for the care of Medi-Cal patients in ... equalized assessed value (as shown on the county tax rolls) per bed per day ... v. Rockefeller (U.S.Dist.Ct., Eastern Dist. N.Y., No. 69--C--641) 305 ... Cal.App.2d 363, 366, 180 P.2d 361; State ex rel. Cosmopolis Consol. School Dist. No. 99, Grays arbor County v. Bruno (1963) 61 Wash.2d 461, 378 P.2d 691, 696; see ... ...
-
Deaconess Hospital v. Washington State Highway Commission
... ... Hospital, commenced this action in Spokane County, seeking to enjoin the Washington State Highway ... given thereto by this court in State ex rel. Pierce Cy. v. Superior Court, 86 Wash. 685, 151 ... declared unconstitutional (Weber & School District No. 7 of Yakima County, 185 Wash. 697, ... 94, 45 P.2d 30; Weber v. School Dist. No. 7, 185 Wash ... Page 398 ... 697, 56 ... Cosmopolis Consolidated School Dist. No. 99, Grays Harbor v. Bruno, 61 Wash.2d 461, 378 P.2d 691 (1963); Miller v ... ...
-
Bayshore Sewerage Co. v. Department of Environmental Protection
... ... DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, State of New Jersey, ... an agency of the State of New ... located in the Township of Hazlet in the County of Monmouth and State of New Jersey serving ... Bruno, 61 Wash.2d 461, 378 P.2d 691, 696 ... --764 (Tex.Civ.App.1961); DuPont-Fort Lewis School Dist. #7 v. Bruno, 79 Wash.2d 736, 489 P.2d 171, ... * * *; licenses to erect river and harbor structures * * *; permits to erect and maintain ... ...