State Ex Rel. Florida Portland Cement Co. v. Hale
Decision Date | 12 October 1937 |
Citation | 129 Fla. 588,176 So. 577 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. FLORIDA PORTLAND CEMENT CO. v. HALE et al. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Nov. 12, 1937.
Original mandamus proceeding by the State of Florida, on the relation of the Florida Portland Cement Company, against A. B. Hale as chairman, and E. A. McColskey and others, as and constituting the State Road Department of the State of Florida. On motion to quash.
Motion denied.
Whitaker Brothers, of Tampa, for relator.
Richard P. Daniel and Fred H. Kent, both of Jacksonville, for respondents.
This is an original proceeding in mandamus. Alternative writ was issued on July 27, 1937, to which the respondents have filed demurrer, which will be considered as motion to quash. The purpose of the writ was to coerce the State Road Department of the state of Florida to comply with the provisions of Senate Bill No. 760, which became a law when it was filed in the office of the Secretary of State on June 5, 1937. We quote the legislative act in full, for the benefit of the bench and bar, as follows:
The particular act sought to be required of the State Road Department is: 'To inspect all cement imported into the State of Florida from any foreign country and sold, offered for sale, or to be used in the State of Florida, and affix thereto evidence showing that said cement has been so inspected and collect therefor the inspection fees fixed in said Act, as the same is on file and deposited with the Secretary of State, as well as carry out, perform and discharge all of the other provisions required under said Act to be done and performed by the said State Road Department.' The language, 'as well as carry out, perform and discharge all of the other provisions required under said Act to be done and performed by the said State Road Department,' may be treated as surplusage because we hold that the act only requires the State Road Department 'to inspect all cement imported into the State of Florida from any foreign country, and sold, offered for sale, or to be used in the State of Florida, and to affix thereto evidence showing that said cement has been so inspected, and to collect therefor the inspection fees fixed by said Act as the same is on file...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Department of Educ. v. Lewis, 61241
...v. King, 47 So.2d 317 (Fla.1950); State ex rel. Harrell v. Cone, 130 Fla. 158, 177 So. 854 (1937); State ex rel. Florida Portland Cement Co. v. Hale, 129 Fla. 588, 176 So. 577 (1937). The comptroller is one officer that has been allowed by Florida courts to initiate litigation in his offici......
-
Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins
...v. King, 47 So.2d 317 (Fla.1950); State ex rel. Harrell v. Cone, 130 Fla. 158, 177 So. 854 (1937); State ex rel. Florida Portland Cement Co. v. Hale, 129 Fla. 588, 176 So. 577 (1937). Lewis, 416 So.2d at 458. Upon closer inspection, the cases cited in Lewis do not support a defensive postur......
-
Department of State Highways of State v. Baker
...... . . In. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. Clausen, 65 Wash. 156,. 117 P. 1101, ...352, 71 S.W.2d. 247. In State ex rel. Florida Portland Cement Co. v. Hale, 129 Fla. 588, 176 So. 577, ......
-
Sunset Harbour Condominium Association v. Robbins, No. SC03-520 (FL 7/7/2005)
...v. King, 47 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1950); State ex rel. Harrell v. Cone, 130 Fla. 158, 177 So. 854 (1937); State ex rel. Florida Portland Cement Co. v. Hale, 129 Fla. 588, 176 So. 577 (1937). Lewis, 416 So. 2d at 458. Upon closer inspection, the cases cited in Lewis do not support a defensive pos......
-
Fuchs v. Robbins dictum on property appraiser standing to challenge taxing statutes inconsistent with longstanding precedent set in Atlantic Coast Line.
...317 (Fla. 1950); State ex rel. Harrell v. Cone, 130 Fla. 158, 177 So. 854 (1937); and State ex rel. Florida Portland Cement Co. v. Hale, 129 Fla. 588, 176 So. 577 (1937), overruled in part sub. nom., Hale v. Bimco Trading, 306 U.S. 375 (1939). All three of these cases turned upon the fact t......