State ex rel. Franklin County v. Tibbe Electric Company

Decision Date31 May 1913
Citation157 S.W. 635,250 Mo. 522
PartiesTHE STATE ex rel. FRANKLIN COUNTY, Appellant, v. TIBBE ELECTRIC COMPANY
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. -- Hon. R. Steele Ryors, Judge.

Reversed and remanded.

John T Barker, Attorney-General, and William M. Fitch, Assistant Attorney-General, for appellant.

(1) The petition follows the language of the statute, and is sufficient in form. Sec. 1013, R.S. 1899; sec. 3026, R.S 1909; State ex rel. v. Land Co., 97 Mo.App. 226; Sec. 3028, R.S. 1909. (2) The second ground of the demurrer does not raise a constitutional question: (a) Such question cannot be raised by demurrer. Sec. 1800, R.S. 1909; State v. Rich, 20 Mo. 393. (b) The allegation as to constitutional violation is too general, indefinite and uncertain to raise a constitutional question. Lohmeyer v Cordage Co., 214 Mo. 688; Street v. School Dist., 221 Mo. 671; Ash v. Independence, 169 Mo. 78; 8 Cyc. 800, sec. 4 ___ b, note 73. (3) Statutes are always presumed to be constitutional, and will be treated as such until the contrary is shown. State v. Thompson, 144 Mo. 314; Ex parte Renfro, 112 Mo. 591; State v. Watts, 111 Mo. 553; State v. Searcy, 111 Mo. 236; 8 Cyc. 801, note 74. (4) A county being a party to this suit, vests jurisdiction in this court. State ex rel. v. Dent, 121 Mo. 162; Corbin v. Adair County, 171 Mo. 385.

John W. Booth for respondent.

OPINION

GRAVES, J.

This is an action to recover the penalty provided by statute for failure of defendant to make report to the Secretary of State as required by law. The cause comes to us from the circuit court of Franklin county. The petition or information reads:

"State of Missouri ex rel. Franklin County, Plaintiff, v. Tibbe Electric Company, Defendant.

"Plaintiff states that on the first day of June A. D. 1909, and from that date up to the present time, defendant was, and still is, a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri, and plaintiff states that at the times mentioned defendant was, and now is, a corporation whose stock is divided into shares, and that it was not a railroad, building and loan, or insurance corporation, nor a corporation exempted from taxation by the laws of the State of Missouri.

"Plaintiff complains of the defendant herein, and for causes of action states that defendant failed to report to the Secretary of State of the State of Missouri on the first day of July A. D. 1909, or within sixty days thereafter, the location of its principal business office, the name of its president and secretary, the amount of its capital stock, both subscribed and paid up, the par value of its stock at the time of making said report, the cash value of all its personal property, and of all its real estate within this State, on the first day of June immediately preceding, and the amount of taxes, city, county and State paid by said defendant in this State for the year preceding the report.

"Wherefore plaintiff prays judgment against the defendant in the sum of one thousand dollars, and the costs of this action.

"W. L. Cole,

"Prosecuting Attorney within and for Franklin County, Missouri."

To the petition the defendant filed a demurrer in this language:

"Now comes the defendant in the above entitled cause and demurs to the petition of plaintiff filed in said cause, and for grounds, of said demurrer, said defendant assigns the following, to-wit:

"1st. That said petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute any cause of action.

"2nd. That the facts stated in said petition show that the said petition is founded solely on the provisions of sections 1013, 1015, 1016 and 1017, Revised Statutes 1899; and said defendant demurs to said petition upon the grounds that the provisions of said sections of said Revised Statutes are in violation of the Constitution of the State of Missouri, and therefore null and void, and therefore said petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute any cause of action."

This demurrer was sustained by the court, and the plaintiff refusing to plead further, judgment was entered up against the plaintiff, and the appeal here is from such judgment. Sections 1013, 1015, 1016 and 1017, Revised Statutes 1899, are now sections 3026, 3028, 3029 and 3030, Revised Statutes 1909. We are interested now in the first and last of the four named sections. Section 3026 reads:

"Sec. 3026. Every incorporated company, other than railroad, building and loan and insurance companies, and such corporations as are exempted from taxation by the laws of this State, whose capital stock is divided into shares, shall, annually, on the first day of July, report to the Secretary of State the location of its principal business office, the name of its president and secretary, the amount of its capital stock, both subscribed and paid up, the par value of its stock and the actual value of its stock at the time of making said report, the cash value of all of its personal property and of all its real estate within this State on the first day of June immediately preceding, and the amount of taxes, city, county and State, paid by the corporation in this State for the year last preceding the report.

Section 3030, supra, reads:

"Section 3030. Every incorporation to which sections 3025 to 3034 inclusive, apply, failing, within sixty days from July the 1st in each year, to make the report herein provided for, shall be subject to a fine of not less than fifty nor more than one thousand dollars for each offense, and each succeeding thirty days of such failure shall constitute a separate offense and be subject to a like fine, which said fines shall be cumulative, and one action may be maintained to recover one or more such fines, to be recovered before any court of competent jurisdiction. No suit shall be maintained for any such offense unless brought within six months from September 1st of the year in which the report is due, which date shall be the time when such right of action accrues; and it is hereby made...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State ex rel. Pulitzer Pub. Co. v. Coleman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 10, 1941
    ... ... Missouri at the relation of the Pulitzer Publishing Company, a Corporation, Relator, v. Frank B. Coleman, as Judge ... 751; Van Dyke v ... Superior Court of Gila County, 24 Ariz. 508, 211 P. 576; ... Michigan Gas & Electric ... 257, 14 Ohio C. C. 111 ...           Franklin ... Miller, William R. Gentry and John L. Gilmore ... Publishing Co., 153 ... Mo. 205; State ex rel. v. Tibbe Electric Co., 250 ... Mo. 522; McClung v. Publishing ... ...
  • Strother v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 26, 1918
    ... ... ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant Supreme Court of Missouri, Second ... laws of the State of Kansas, such defense is a vested ... property ... Railroad, 249 Mo. 197; State ex rel ... v. Tibbe Elec. Co., 250 Mo. 522, 157 S.W ... ...
  • Jacobs v. Cauthorn
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1922
    ... ... 1531; Brick v. Meyers, 196 Mo.App. 296; State ex ... rel. v. Drainage District, 269 Mo. 453; ... (3) An estimate by the school board to the county ... clerk is an essential prerequisite to ... c. 32, 145 S.W. 438; State ex rel. Franklin County ... v. Tibbe Electric Co., 250 Mo. 522, ... ...
  • Lieber v. Heil
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 7, 1927
    ... ... subdivision 32 of the Constitution of the State of Missouri, ... in that an action under section ... Constitution of Missouri. State ex rel. Niedmeyer v ... Hackman, 292 Mo. 32, 237 S.W ... was violated by the statute. Rubber Company v. Adam, ... 213 S.W. 80; State ex rel. v ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT