State ex rel. Hayes v. The Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Company
| Decision Date | 17 November 1896 |
| Citation | State ex rel. Hayes v. The Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Company, 37 S.W. 532, 135 Mo. 618 (Mo. 1896) |
| Parties | The State ex rel. Hayes, Appellant, v. The Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad Company |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Original Opinion of November 17, 1896, Reported at: 135 Mo. 618. [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Per Curiam. -- On rehearing in banc paragraphs numbered 1, 2, and 3 of the foregoing opinion of Brace, P. J., in division number one, are concurred in by all the judges; in paragraph numbered 4, none concur, but instead all the judges, except Brace, C. J., concur in the foregoing opinion of Macfarlane, J., in regard to those taxes. The judgment of the circuit court is therefore reversed and the cause remanded to the circuit court with directions to enter judgment for plaintiff for the amount of taxes sued for except such as are found in these opinions to be illegal.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Monarch Vinegar Works v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.
... ... CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant Supreme Court of Missouri December ... to recover under the penal section of the State statute ... and not otherwise, is apparent from ... State ex rel. v ... Public Service Comm., 270 Mo. 565; 19 ... ...
-
The State ex inf. Hadley v. Corcoran
...139 Mo. 333; Packard v. Richardson, 17 Mass. 144; Ferry v. Ridge, 56 Mo.App. 615; Venable v. Railroad, 112 Mo. 103; State ex rel. v. Railroad, 135 Mo. 618; v. Warfield, 13 Md. 279; Westbrook v. Miller, 56 Mich. 148; Kelley v. Multnomah Co., 18 Ore. 356; 2 Lewis' Sutherland on Statutory Inte......
-
Walker v. St. Louis & Suburban Ry. Co.
... ... ST. LOUIS & SUBURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant Court of Appeals of Missouri, St ... railroad train; such are the facts in Cogan v. Cass ... 149. When, however, ... a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly ... ...
-
John Stewart & Co. v. Andes
... ... v. Bode, 24 P. 271; Shortelle v. St. Joseph, ... 104 Mo. 121; Lin v. Railroad, 10 Mo.App ... the counties of Buchanan and Andrew, this State, ... agreed in writing with defendant to appoint ... ...