State ex rel. Leidigh v. Holcomb
Decision Date | 09 January 1896 |
Docket Number | 8057 |
Citation | 65 N.W. 873,46 Neb. 612 |
Parties | STATE OF NEBRASKA, EX REL. GEORGE W. LEIDIGH, WARDEN OF THE STATE PENITENTIARY, v. SILAS A. HOLCOMB, GOVERNOR, ET AL |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
ORIGINAL application for mandamus to compel the members of the state board of purchase and supplies to meet with the relator and make estimates, and purchase provisions and supplies for the penitentiary. Writ allowed.
WRIT ALLOWED.
Darnall & Kirkpatrick, for relator:
Reference was made to the following cases: White v. City of Lincoln, 5 Neb. 505; City of Tecumseh v Phillips, 5 Neb. 305; Ives v. Norris, 13 Neb 254; Miller v. Hurford, 11 Neb. 381; Dawson County v. McNamar, 10 Neb. 276; Trumble v Trumble, 37 Neb. 340; People v. Denahy, 20 Mich. 349; Weigel v. City of Hastings, 29 Neb. 379; State v. Nomland, 3 N. Dak., 427; State v. Bartley, 41 Neb. 277; State v. Wallichs, 12 Neb. 407, 15 Neb. 457, 609; State v. Board of Public Lands & Buildings, 7 Neb. 42; State v. Bacon, 6 Neb. 286; In re Board of Public Lands & Buildings, 18 Neb. 340, 37 Neb. 425; Lawson v. Gibson, 18 Neb. 137; State v. Babcock, 21 Neb. 599; Stone v. Green, 3 Hill [N. Y.], 472; State v. Maccuaig, 8 Neb. 215; State v. Howe, 28 Neb. 618.
A. S. Churchill, Attorney General, and George A. Day, Deputy Attorney General, contra, cited: State v. Stout, 7 Neb. 89; State v. Lancaster County Bank, 8 Neb. 218; In re Appropriations, 25 Neb. 665; Van Horn v. State, 46 Neb. 62; State v. Whittemore, 12 Neb. 252; State v. Ream, 16 Neb. 681; Stricklett v. State, 31 Neb. 674; Smails v. White, 4 Neb. 353; Sovereign v. State, 7 Neb. 409; People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 481; State v. Bemis, 45 Neb. 724; Lewis v. Stout, 22 Wis. 236; Commonwealth v. Green, 58 Pa. 226; Board of Supervisors v. Heenan, 2 Minn. 281; Bright v. McCullough, 27 Ind. 223; Indiana C. R. Co. v. Potts, 7 Ind. 681; City of St. Louis v. Tiefel, 42 Mo. 589; Curry v. Elvires, 3 Vroom [N. J.], 363; State v. Squires, 26 Iowa 345; State v. County Judge of Davis County, 2 Iowa 280.
This is an original application for a writ of mandamus, on the relation of George W. Leidigh, as warden of the state penitentiary, to compel the respondents, as members of the board of purchase and supplies, to meet with the relator as such warden and make an estimate of the supplies necessary for the maintenance of said penitentiary for the current quarter, to advertise for bids therefor, and make contracts for such supplies in accordance with the provisions of the act approved February 15, 1877. (Compiled Statutes [ed. 1895], sec. 2, art. 12, ch. 83.) It is by the act mentioned made the duty of said board, consisting of the governor, commissioner of public lands and buildings, secretary of state, treasurer, and attorney general, at least one month previous to the first days of January, April, July, and October of each year, to meet with the warden of the penitentiary and superintendent of each of the asylums or other public institutions and determine the supplies necessary for such institutions for the quarter next ensuing, and which shall be contracted for by said board in the manner therein prescribed after advertisement in a newspaper having a general circulation in the state. It is further provided that no bids shall be considered unless accompanied by the bonds of the proposed contractors in such amount and with such conditions as the board may prescribe, and that all supplies not furnished in accordance with the provisions of said act shall be purchased under the written instructions of said board. The respondents, except the governor (who refuses to join in resisting the relator's demand) having waived the issuance and service of the alternative writ, have filed a pleading in the nature of an answer, in which it is in substance alleged that the board of public lands and buildings, in the exercise of the authority conferred by the constitution and statutes of the state, on the 3d day of September, 1895, leased to A. D. Beemer, until the last day of the next session of the legislature, all of the convict labor in said prison, together with the grounds, yards, shops, and machinery pertaining thereto; that one of the considerations for said lease was the agreement by the said Beemer to suitably feed and clothe the convicts confined in said prison. It is further alleged that said lessee has been since the date named, and now is, ready and willing to furnish all of the supplies required for said prison and the convicts therein as by his lease provided, but that the relator has ever since said date refused, and still refuses, to accept from said lessee any supplies, or to permit him to employ any of said convicts. The lease above mentioned is here set out at length:
To continue reading
Request your trial- State v. Moore
-
State v. Moore
... ... 344, 1 N.W ... 243; Ottenstein v. Alpaugh, 9 Neb. 237, 2 N.W. 219; ... State v. Holcomb, 46 Neb. 612, 65 ... ...
-
Ace Bus Transp. Co. v. S. Hudson County Boulevard Bus Owners' Ass'n
... ... proceedings, except to prevent the violation of some law of the state, or to protect some right already acquired ... 4 ... E. 809); Lackland v. Walker, 151 Mo. 265, 52 S. W. 414; State ex rel" Leidigh v. Holcomb, 46 Neb. 625, 65 N. W. 873; and many others ... \xC2" ... ...
-
State ex rel. Wright v. Savage
... ... Johnson, 4 Wall. [U. S.], 475, 499 ... In our ... own state, the case of State v. Holcomb, 46 Neb ... 612, is not in point. In that case the action was not brought ... against the governor in that capacity ... The ... ...