State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railway Company v. Public Service Commission
Decision Date | 13 June 1918 |
Citation | 204 S.W. 395,275 Mo. 60 |
Parties | THE STATE ex rel. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and BENJAMIN F. BUSH, Receiver, Appellant, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Cole Circuit Court. -- Hon. J. G. Slate, Judge.
Reversed and remanded (with directions).
James F. Green and H. H. Larimore for appellant.
(1) The order of the Public Service Commission requiring the installation and maintenance of track scales at Rich Hill for the sole purpose of weighing carload shipments of grain, and Sec. 3157, R. S. 1909, on which said order is based, are a discrimination in favor of one class of shippers and are invalid and unauthorized. Sec. 23, Art. 12, Mo. Constitution; Railroad v. State, 107 P. 929; Midland Valley Railroad v. State, 133 P. 27; Ry. Co. v. Mo. Pub Ser. Com., 192 S.W. 460. (2) The order of the Commission, requiring the relators to expend money and use the property of the railway company in a specified manner, is not a mere administrative order, but is a taking of property and to be valid must be justified by a public necessity, and must not be unreasonable or arbitrary, and no such public necessity being shown, to enforce the order is to take relators' property without due process of law. State ex rel. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co. v. Fairchild, 224 U.S 510; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Minnesota, 238 U.S 340; Interstate Com. Com. v. L. & N. Railroad Co., 227 U.S. 88; Railroad v. Wisconsin, 238 U.S. 491. (3) Sec. 3157, R. S. 1909, was in effect repealed by the Public Service Act approved March 17, 1913, and the order of the Commission is invalid in that it is based upon arbitrary provisions of said Section 3157, and not upon any findings of fact made by the Commission pursuant to a hearing held under the provisions of said Public Service Act. Sec. 49, Public Service Act, Laws 1913; State ex rel. Rhodes v. Public Ser. Com., 270 Mo. 547; State ex rel. M. K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Pub. Ser. Com., 271 Mo. 270. (4) If said Section 3157 has not been repealed, then to enforce the same, or any order of the Public Service Commission made pursuant to its terms, would be arbitrary and unreasonable and would constitute the taking of the property of relators without due process of law, in violation of the provisions of Section 1, Article 14, Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Nebraska, 217 U.S. 196; Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Nebraska, 164 U.S. 403.
A. Z. Patterson, General Counsel and James D. Lindsay, Assistant Counsel, for respondent.
(1) Track scales are a convenience -- a facility or an instrumentality of transportation. All carload shipments are weighed by railroads on the first track scales available, and the freight charges, and all transactions between the shipper and carrier, are based exclusively upon this weight. Great Northern Railway v. Minnesota, 238 U.S. 340. (2) Since track scales are a transportation facility, the Public Service Commission has been granted power by the Legislature (Section 49, Public Service Act) to require their erection and maintenance, when public convenience and necessity demand that they "ought reasonably to be provided." (3) Section 3157, R. S. 1909, has not been revoked by express repeal, nor is it directly in conflict with the provisions of the Public Service Act. If it is repealed by implication, or is violative of constitutional provisions, as providing for the taking of property without due process of law, it can only be authoritatively declared repealed or held unconstitutional by the judicial branch of the State government, and not by the Public Service Commission, a non-judicial body. Lusk v. Atkinson, 268 Mo. 109. (4) If this court finds that Section 3157 has been repealed, or is violative of constitutional provisions, it should not reverse the judgment of the circuit court in toto, but should direct the circuit court to remand the cause to the Commission for the taking of further testimony, and for the determination of the question of whether or not public convenience and necessity reasonably require the installation and maintenance of track scales at Rich Hill. "The court may, in its discretion, remand any cause which is reversed by it to the Commission for further action." Section 3, Public Service Act; See, also, Secs. 39, 49, Public Service Act; Shallenberger Elev. Co. v. Ill. Central Railroad, 278 Ill. 333.
OPINIONIn Banc.
For a number of years the Missouri Pacific Railway Company has maintained track scales at Rich Hill, Missouri. For five or six months the scales had been out of repair, and were not in use. The company were about to remove the scales, and the commercial club of the city of Rich Hill filed complaint with the Public Service Commission asking that the railway company be compelled to erect and maintain proper scales on its tracks at such city. This the Public Service Commission directed, and their judgment, under statutory certiorari to the circuit court of Cole County, was by such court sustained, and by appeal taken by the railway company and B. F. Bush, its receiver, the case comes here.
The order of the Public Service Commission, as well as the opinion of the commission does not find that these scales are a necessary public convenience, except in the following limited way. The commission in its opinion says:
From this it is clear that the Commission was of the opinion that the terms of said Section 3157, Revised Statutes 1909, fixed the measure of public necessity, and the evidence having shown the quantity of grain therein named the Commission was bound to find a public necessity, although the other evidence might disclose a different situation. The other evidence did strongly tend to show a different situation. It is clear that the Commission based its judgment as to public convenience on this statute. In so doing the railway urges error, in that the statute is of no force since the passage of the Public Service Commission Act. Such is the...
To continue reading
Request your trial