State ex rel. Normandy Fire Protection Dist. v. Smith

• Citation: 216 S.W.2d 440,358 Mo. 572
• Decision Date: 22 December 1948
• Docket Number: 41235
• Parties: State of Missouri at the Relation of Normandy Fire Protection District, Relator, v. Forrest Smith, State Auditor of Missouri, Respondent
• Court: United States State Supreme Court of Missouri

216 S.W.2d 440

358 Mo. 572

State of Missouri at the Relation of Normandy Fire Protection District, Relator, v. Forrest Smith, State Auditor of Missouri, Respondent

No. 41235

Supreme Court of Missouri

December 22, 1948

Original Proceeding in Mandamus.

Writ issued.

Roy H Bergmann for relator.

(1) Mandamus is the proper remedy to compel the State Auditor to register the bonds of the relator. State ex rel. City of Jefferson v. Hackmann, 287 Mo. 156, 229 S.W. 1082; State ex rel. Webster Groves Sanitary Sewer Dist. v Smith, 337 Mo. 855, 87 S.W.2d 147. (2) The Act of the 64th General Assembly of Missouri (Laws of Missouri 1947, p 432) authorizing the incorporation of the Relator's Fire Protective District is constitutional. Article II of the Missouri Constitution does not prohibit the delegation of duties which are not judicial to judicial officers unless they are clearly such as are confined by the Constitution itself to the executive or legislative department. Birmingham Drainage Dist. v. Chicago, B. & Q. Railroad Co., 274 Mo. 140, 202 S.W.2d 404; State ex rel. Manning v. Higgins, 125 Mo. 364, 28 S.W. 638; Rhodes v. Bell, 230 Mo. 138, 130 S.W. 465; Schwab v. St. Louis, 310 Mo. 116, 274 S.W. 1058. (3) The General Assembly, over a period of many decades, has construed Article III as permitting the delegation to courts of the power to create political or municipal subdivisions. The acts listed below were held or recognized as valid in the cases cited below: Laws of Missouri 1845, p. 1048, now Section 7242, R.S. 1939, authorizing the incorporation of towns and villages by the county court when certain prescribed facts have been found and "that the prayer of the petitioner is reasonable." Kayser v. Trustees, 16 Mo. 88; R.S. 1939, Chap. 79, Art. 1; Birmingham Drain. Dist. v. Chicago, B. & Q. Railroad Co., 274 Mo. 140, 202 S.W.2d 404; Chap. 79, Art. 7, R.S. 1939; Labadie Bottoms River Protection Dist. v. Randall, 348 Mo. 867, 156 S.W.2d 713; Chap. 79, Art. 12, R.S. 1939; Grossman v. Public Water Supply District No. 1 of Clay County, 339 Mo. 344, 96 S.W.2d 701; Chap. 80, Art. 1, R.S. 1939; State ex rel. Webster Groves Sanitary Sewer Dist. v. Smith, 337 Mo. 855, 87 S.W.2d 147; Sec. 10743 (Review by Circuit Court of Business of the St. Louis Board of Education); State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Education of St. Louis, 294 Mo. 106, 242 S.W. 85; R.S. 1929, Chap. 65, since repealed (Sewer District Act); State ex rel. Gentry v. Curtis, 319 Mo. 316, 4 S.W.2d 467; Charter of the City of St. Louis, Article XXI (Condemnation and levy and assessment of special assessments); Schwab v. St. Louis, 310 Mo. 116, 274 S.W. 1058. (4) In other jurisdictions the courts have upheld the delegation to the courts of functions, involving the exercise of discretion, in the creation of political or municipal subdivisions. Norfolk County v. Duke, 113 Va. 94, 73 S.E. 456; Morris v. Taylor, 70 W.Va. 618, 74 S.E. 872; Pelletier v. Ashton, 12 S.D. 366, 81 N.W. 735; Young v. Salt Lake City, 24 Utah 321, 67 P. 1066; State ex rel. Skordahl v. Flaherty, 140 Minn. 19, 167 N.W. 122; Snyder v. Deeds, 91 Ohio St. 407, 110 N.E. 1068; Dillon Catfish Drain. Dist. v. Bank of Dillon, 143 S.C. 178, 141 S.E. 274; Re Valley Center Drain. Dist., 64 Mont. 545, 211 P. 218; Larson v. Seneca Independent School Dist., 50 S.D. 444, 210 N.W. 661. (5) The circuit court does not create a fire district; it merely calls an election. The district is created by the action of the inhabitants. (6) The necessity of the organization of a fire protection district for the accomplishment of the purposes fully set forth by the Legislature in the act is an ultimate fact to be determined from the evidence adduced. The act requires that the facts constituting necessity be presented to the court by pleading and proof. Sections 10 and 11, Fire District Act. (7) The Fire District Act prohibits any attack on the legality of the incorporation of a district, either directly or collaterally, except by an action in the nature of a writ of quo warranto commenced by the Attorney General "within thirty days after said decree declaring such district finally organized as herein provided, and not otherwise." Section 15, Fire District Act.

J. E. Taylor, Attorney General, and George W. Crowley, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

(1) The State Auditor may not register bonds issued by any such municipal corporate district as relator alleges itself to be, unless and until the record shows the issuing district is legally organized. This burden rests upon relator. State ex rel. Fire District of Lemay v. Smith, 353 Mo. 807, 184 S.W.2d 593; State ex rel. School District v. Smith, 336 Mo. 703, 80 S.W.2d 858. (2) The creation of a municipal corporation or political subdivision of the State and the determination of the circumstances or conditions which will justify the creation of such a body is a legislative function. This legislative power cannot be delegated to a court, or to individuals. 12 C.J., pp. 842, 853; State ex rel. Jones v. Brown, 338 Mo. 448, 92 S.W.2d 718; State v. Field, 17 Mo. 529; State ex rel. Dome v. Wilcox, 45 Mo. 458. (3) Article II of the 1945 Constitution of Missouri provides that the powers of government shall be divided into three distinct departments -- the legislative, executive and judicial -- and that no person charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments shall exercise any power properly belonging to either of the other departments. Sec. 1, Art. II, Constitution of Missouri, 1945; State ex rel. Manning v. Higgins, 125 Mo. 364, 25 S.W. 638.

OPINION

Tipton, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the state auditor to register bonds in the amount of $ 125,000, issued by the relator. The respondent refused registration on the ground that the act authorizing the incorporation of the fire district and the issuance of the bonds is unconstitutional.

The act (Laws of Missouri, 1947, p. 432, House Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 112) provides for the incorporation of fire districts in counties of not less than 400,000 nor more than 800,000 inhabitants.

The petition for mandamus alleges that on November 20, 1947, a petition for the incorporation of Normandy Fire Protection District was filed in the circuit court of St. Louis County, Missouri, for the purpose of creating a fire district as authorized by the above act. That petition was signed by 100 taxpaying electors of the proposed district and a filing fee of $ 100 was paid the circuit court. It also defined the boundaries of the proposed fire district.

The clerk of the circuit court caused a notice to be published in a newspaper published in the county and sent a copy of such notice to each of the governing bodies of the municipalities having territory within the proposed boundaries of the proposed district. The court set January 8, 1948, as the date for the hearing and on that date a hearing was held and the court took the matter under advisement. On January 28, 1948, the court found the petition filed was in conformity with the act, that no protesting petition had been filed, that the facts stated in the petition were true and that it was necessary that the district be incorporated in order that protection against fire by any available means might be supplied. The court's interlocutory decree declared the incorporation of the district subject to an election in the district. The decree also ordered the election commissioners of St. Louis County to call and hold an election on March 30, 1948, and submit to the qualified electors of the district the proposition of incurring indebtedness of the district in the amount of $ 125,000.

An election was held in accordance with the decree and the canvass of the votes showed that there were 1,165 votes for the incorporation and 337 against; 1,095 for the issuance of the bonds and 312 against; and that Roger A. Rick, William Dietrich and Thomas P. Bradley had been elected as directors. On April 24, 1948, the circuit court entered a final decree of incorporation of the Normandy Fire Protection District.

On May 5, 1948, the board of directors passed a resolution for the issuance of the bonds of the district in the sum of $ 125,000. These bonds were tendered to the respondent for registration and he refused to register them.

In his return to our writ the respondent admits all the facts in the petition for mandamus but states that the act "under which the Bond sought to be registered is purportedly authorized, is unconstitutional in that it delegates legislative powers to the Circuit Court in violation of the Provisions of Article II, of the Constitution of the State of Missouri of 1945," also that it delegates legislative powers to private individuals.

Relator filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

If the act is unconstitutional, then relator was not legally...