State ex rel. Randel v. Scott
| Decision Date | 31 December 1952 |
| Docket Number | No. 4340,4340 |
| Citation | State ex rel. Randel v. Scott, 95 Ohio App. 197, 118 N.E.2d 426 (Ohio App. 1952) |
| Parties | , 53 O.O. 132 STATE ex rel. RANDEL v. SCOTT. . Summit County |
| Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. A police officer of a municipal corporation is a public officer whose salary exists as a creature of the law and as an incident to his office. However, the subject of sick-leave benefits for such officer is a matter of state control under the civil service law of this state.
2. The state Legislature may define the terms it uses in the statutes, and, by so doing, designate a police officer as an 'employee' within the meaning of the civil service law.
Paul C. Laybourne, Akron, for plaintiff.
Donald F. Kepple, City Sol., Cuyahoga Falls, for defendant.
This is an action in mandamus, filed originally in this court, in which the state of Ohio, on relation of Thomas Randel, prays for the issuance of a writ against Raymond Scott, auditor of the city of Cuyahoga Falls, to compel the payment of the balance of relator's full salary as a police officer of the city for a period of time during which he was on 'sick leave' due to injuries received not in the line of duty.
The amount sought is one hundred and seventy dollars. The city admits in its pleading a legal obligation to pay eighty-seven dollars and eighty-three cents, by virtue of a city ordinance regulating pay for sick leave of city 'employees.'
This court has heretofore determined that 'A police officer of a municipal corporation is a public officer and his salary is an incident of the office itself.' Wright v. City of Lorain, 70 Ohio App. 337, at p. 340, 46 N.E.2d 325, at page 327.
It is a fundamental principle of the law of public officers that the right of an officer to his salary does not depend upon contract, but exists as a creature of the law and as an incident to the office. So long as one occupies his office, such officer is entitled to the compensation attached thereto, even if he is prevented by sickness from performing the duties of the office. This principle of law, however, is not operative in the face of valid statutory or ordinance regulations providing for the rate of compensation, if any, during an officer's absence from his duties. See 43 American Jurisprudence, Public Officers, Section 379; 168 A.L.R. 476, annotation.
Tenure, dismissal, suspension, and related matters concerning a police officer, are subject to state control. State ex rel. Arey v. Sherrill, City Manager, 142 Ohio St. 574, 53 N.E.2d 501. As a part of such state control, the Legislature of this state has enacted a civil service law, Section 486-1a et seq., General Code, and has placed police officers within the classified service, Section 4378, General Code, Section 486-17c of this act provides for sick-leave payments to employees in governmental agencies. This statute reads in part as follows:
...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Hord
...of Fire and Police Com'rs, 131 N.J.L. 443, 37 A.2d 85; Canteline v. McClellan, 282 N.Y. 166, 25 N.E.2d 972; State ex rel. Randel v. Scott, 95 Ohio App. 197, 118 N.E.2d 426; Morris v. Parks, 145 Or. 481, 28 P.2d 215; Mann v. City of Lynchburg, 129 Va. 453, 106 S.E. 371; National Labor Relati......
-
Roybal v. Santa Fe County
...incapacity to perform the duties of the office. Hanchey v. State ex rel. Roberts (Fla.1951), 52 So.2d 429; State ex rel. Randel v. Scott, 95 Ohio App. 197, 118 N.E.2d 426 (1952); and Webb v. City of Hugo, 169 Okl. 438, 37 P.2d 621 (1934). The remedy for derelictions is by way of removal, im......
-
State ex rel. Mikus v. Hirbe
...court has heretofore determined in Wright v. City of Lorain, 70 Ohio App. 337, at p. 340, 46 N.E.2d 325, and State ex rel. Randel, v. Scott, Aud., 95 Ohio App. 197, 118 N.E.2d 246, that a police officer of a municipal corporation is a public officer. We were supported in that determination ......
-
Bruce Adkins v. City of Portsmouth, Ohio
... ... the state may be reviewed by the common pleas court of the ... county in which ... of Education (1973), ... 36 Ohio St.2d 62; The State Ex Rel. Dean v Huddle ... (1975), 45 Ohio App.2d 163. Inasmuch as there is ... In that respect, see State ex rel ... Randel v Scott (1952), 95 Ohio App. 197 ... For ... the ... ...