State of Florida v. Fleming
| Decision Date | 01 December 1999 |
| Parties | (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1999) STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. TIMOTHY FLEMING, Appellee. CASE NO. 99-0924 JULY TERM 1999 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan Lebow, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-16188CF10A.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorney General, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
The state appeals a downward departure sentence based on the ground that the offense was committed in an unsophisticated manner and was an isolated incident for which defendant showed remorse. Section 921.0016(4)(j), Florida Statutes(1997).
Appellee was charged with purchasing cannabis. The issue which concerns us is whether a purchase of drugs can be committed in an "unsophisticated manner." The word "unsophisticated" is generally defined in the dictionaries we have looked at as being the opposite of sophisticated. One of the definitionsof sophisticated is "having acquired worldly knowledge or refinement; lacking natural simplicity or naivete." American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (1981).
Appellee relies on State v. Merritt, 714 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), in which a downward departure was given on the same ground as the ground in the present case, where the defendant was sentenced for committing a lewd and lascivious or indecent act on a fifteen year old victim. After acknowledging that the words used in the guidelines, including "unsophisticated," should be construed liberally in favor of the defendant, the fifth district affirmed the departure, explaining that the defendant's "acts were artless, simple and not refined." Id. at 1154 n.3.
In the present case the evidence showed that, as the police were executing a warranted search of an apartment, the defendant knocked on the door and asked to speak to "Alfred." When he was told that Alfred wasn't there he stated, "I only have fifteen dollars for three sacks," and was sold the drug.
Under Banks v. State, 732 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 1999), our standard of review is to determine whether there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding that this crime was committed in an unsophisticated manner. Construing "unsophisticated" liberally in favor of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Fureman, 5D12–2778.
...was “artless, simple and not refined.” State v. Merritt, 714 So.2d 1153, 1154 n. 3 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). The facts in State v. Fleming, 751 So.2d 620, 621 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), and State v. Gilson, 800 So.2d 727 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), are instructive examples of the artlessness and simplicity o......
-
Staffney v. State, 4D01-4126.
...758 So.2d 1222, 1224-25 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citations omitted); see also Banks v. State, 732 So.2d 1065 (Fla.1999); State v. Fleming, 751 So.2d 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). A departure sentence may be imposed where the trial court finds that the "offense was committed in an unsophisticated man......
-
State v. Bell
...again." The state also argues that Bell's act of driving a car was not unsophisticated as that word was defined in State v. Fleming, 751 So.2d 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). In that case, the court noted that "unsophisticated" is regarded as the opposite of sophisticated, which it defined as "hav......
-
State v. Salgado
...the neighbor's firearms out of a window, and then was found the next day by the police, asleep in the neighbor's bed); State v. Fleming, 751 So.2d 620 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(finding competent substantial evidence to support that the crime of purchasing cannabis was committed in an unsophistica......