State St. Properties, Inc. v. Mizrahi
Decision Date | 19 November 1964 |
Parties | STATE STREET PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph MIZRAHI, d/b/a Rae-Me Shops, Defendant-Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term |
Bernstein, Weiss, Hammer & Parter, New York City, Norman A. Coplan and Stephen I. Shapiro, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.
J. Leon Israel, New York City, for respondent.
Before HOFSTADTER, J. P., and HECHT and TILZER, JJ.
In an action on a cognovit judgment of the State of Illinois which was for rent due pursuant to a valid and existing lease, respondent's contention that the warrant of authority to confess judgment was limited to money due under said lease for rent and that no rent was due because the premises were unoccupied and therefore the Illinois Court lacked jurisdiction, constitutes an attempt to litigate the merits of the original controversy in a collateral attack, under the guise of a jurisdictional objection, and would be violative of the 'full faith and credit' clause of the U. S. Constitution.
It is to be observed, although such alternative jurisdictional ground is not emphasized in the dissenting memorandum, that the Illinois statute (section 50 Illinois Civil Practice Act, Ill.Rev.St.1963, c. 110, § 50 (4)) provides that 'Any person * * * may confess judgment * * * without process * * * provided, that the application to confess judgment * * * be made in county in which the note or obligation was executed * * *'. The statements of claim under which the judgments were entered each state that the instrument was executed in the County of Cook, State of Illinois.
Under the Illinois statute neither process, personal appearance or the residence of the defendant is necessary or material to the validity of a cognovit judgment (Morris v. Douglass, 237 App.Div. 747, 749, 262 N.Y.S. 712, 714; Turner v. Alton Banking and Trust Co., 8 Cir., 181 F.2d 899, 905; Bower v. Casanave, D.C., 44 F.Supp. 501, 504-505). Lastly, we note that while there is no disagreement as to the applicable foreign law, its tenor nevertheless is a matter for our determination (CPLR Rule 4511).
Order reversed, with $10 costs, and motion granted.
We are cautioned not to grant the 'drastic remedy' of summary judgment when there is any doubt as to the existence of issues or where an issue is arguable (Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox, 3 N.Y.2d 395, 404, 165 N.Y.S.2d 498, 504, 144 N.E.2d 387; Stone v. Goodson, 8 N.Y.2d 8, 12-13, 200 N.Y.S.2d 627, 628, 167 N.E.2d 328, 329). Such issues include the applicable foreign law (Werfel v. Zionostenska Banka, 287 N.Y. 91, 93, 38 N.E.2d 382; Greiner v. Freund, 286 App.Div. 996, 144 N.Y.S.2d 766; Schwartz v. Schwartz, 190 Misc. 757, 759-760, 75 N.Y.S.2d 592, 594).
The cognovit judgments were entered in the Municipal Court of Chicago--First District (Cook County) under Section 50 of the Illinois Civil Practice Act. The applicable provision of subdivision 4 read:
Sub (Emphasis supplied.)
The 'statement of claim' under which each judgment was entered alleged that defendant then resided or was carrying on business in Cook County.
The lease between the parties dated January 30, 1961, does not show where it was executed by defendant. Plaintiff's notices under the lease asserting that defendant was in default under the lease, were sent to defendant in New York. The record is replete with evidence that defendant resided in New York when the confessions of judgment were filed and that he was not doing business in Cook County at that time. It would thus appear that the jurisdictional allegations in the statements of claim to the contrary were inaccurrate.
The statements of claim were made by counsel for plaintiff in 1963; and the attached cognovit was signed by a lawyer chosen by plaintiff. Plaintiff's agent who verified the statements of claim and made the moving affidavit in the court below, had not subscribed the lease for plaintiff. He did not say, in his moving affidavit, where the lease was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Quarles
...255 N.Y.S.2d 599 ... 44 Misc.2d 955 ... The PEOPLE of the State of New York ... Raymond QUARLES, Defendant ... Supreme Court, Special and ... ...
-
Martens v. Bethel
...law of a sister state though neither pleaded nor proved (Monko v. Cicoria, 46 Misc.2d 565, 260 N.Y.S.2d 70; State Street Properties, Inc. v. Mizrahi, 44 Misc.2d 964, 254 N.Y.S.2d 776; Gevinson v. Kirkeby-Natus Corp., 26 A.D.2d 71, 270 N.Y.S.2d 989). Although the courts previously withheld j......